Re: base gcc and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99

2013-02-01 Thread David Chisnall
On 1 Feb 2013, at 13:31, Andriy Gapon wrote: > cstdlib would provide e.g. std::strtoull only when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 is > defined. This is entirely consistent with the standard. strtoull() should only be visible when compiling in C++11 mode, it is not part of C++98 / C++03. David signature.a

Re: base gcc and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99

2013-02-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 01/02/2013 15:08 Dimitry Andric said the following: > On 2013-02-01 14:01, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 28/01/2013 17:11 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>> I wonder why the following is the case for the base gcc. >>> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++config.h: >>> >>> /* Define if C99 functions or mac

Re: base gcc and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99

2013-02-01 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-01 14:01, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 28/01/2013 17:11 Andriy Gapon said the following: I wonder why the following is the case for the base gcc. /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++config.h: /* Define if C99 functions or macros from , , , , and can be used or exposed. */ /* #undef _GLIBCXX_

Re: base gcc and _GLIBCXX_USE_C99

2013-02-01 Thread Andriy Gapon
[ping] on 28/01/2013 17:11 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > Guys, > > I wonder why the following is the case for the base gcc. > /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/c++config.h: > > /* Define if C99 functions or macros from , , , >, and can be used or exposed. */ > /* #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 */