Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
189100 ok
189150 fails
I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
189150 is in the middle of a big string of rela
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
189100 ok
189150 fails
I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
189150 is in the middle of a big string of related commits. Try
upda
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >>> it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
> >>> it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
> >>> 189100 ok
> >>> 189150 fails
> >>> I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> 189150 is in the middle of a big
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> > it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
> > it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
> > 189100 ok
> > 189150 fails
> > I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
> >
> >
>
> 189150 is in the middle of a big string of related commits. Try
> u
Danny Braniss wrote:
it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
189100 ok
189150 fails
I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
189150 is in the middle of a big string of related commits. Try
updating to the following
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >>> at least for me :-)
> >>> [and sorry for the cross posting]
> >>>
> >>> old (March 12 , i know need the svn rev number but...)
> >> None of the commit activity on March 12 is jumping out at me as being
> >> suspicious. However, you are now th
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 06:52:32PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > Danny Braniss wrote:
> > > at least for me :-)
> > > [and sorry for the cross posting]
> > >
> > > old (March 12 , i know need the svn rev number but...)
> >
> > None of the commit activity on March 12 is jumping out at me as bein
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
at least for me :-)
[and sorry for the cross posting]
old (March 12 , i know need the svn rev number but...)
None of the commit activity on March 12 is jumping out at me as being
suspicious. However, you are now the second person who has told me
abou
> Danny Braniss wrote:
> > at least for me :-)
> > [and sorry for the cross posting]
> >
> > old (March 12 , i know need the svn rev number but...)
>
> None of the commit activity on March 12 is jumping out at me as being
> suspicious. However, you are now the second person who has told me
> a
9 matches
Mail list logo
