On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:38:15 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
MG> Actually I don't see reasons why this may not be p_cansee, so I
MG> updated the patch and going to commit it if there is no objections.
The updated patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/kern_proc_osrel.2.patch
--
Mikolaj Golub
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we can check and change binary osreldate of another process via
> procfs(5).
>
> Kostik suggested to add a new sysctl for the same purpose and also extend
> procstat to show osrel.
>
> Here are patches I am going to commit i
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:29:01 +0100 Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
JT> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:30:05PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> I added osrel output to procstat -b option:
>> kopusha:~% procstat -b 2975
>> PID COMMOSREL PATH
>> 2975 emacs 101 /usr/local/bi
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:38:22PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:26:53 +0200 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:02 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >>
> >> JH> Woul
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:26:53 +0200 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KB> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:02 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>
>> JH> Would this be a planned MFC to stable/N as well specifcially 8 ?
>>
>> I plan to M
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:30:05PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> I added osrel output to procstat -b option:
> kopusha:~% procstat -b 2975
> PID COMMOSREL PATH
> 2975 emacs 101 /usr/local/bin/emacs-23.3
> Would this be ok or someone see a better way?
Hmm, this
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:02 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> JH> Would this be a planned MFC to stable/N as well specifcially 8 ?
>
> I plan to MFC to stable/9 if there is no objections.
I do not see why the merge to stable/8
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:02 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote:
JH> Would this be a planned MFC to stable/N as well specifcially 8 ?
I plan to MFC to stable/9 if there is no objections.
--
Mikolaj Golub
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:51:25PM +, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
>
> On 17 Mar 2012, at 19:30, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> > Currently we can check and change binary osreldate of another process via
> > procfs(5).
> >
> > Kostik suggested to add a new sysctl for the same purpose and also extend
On 17 Mar 2012, at 19:30, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Currently we can check and change binary osreldate of another process via
> procfs(5).
>
> Kostik suggested to add a new sysctl for the same purpose and also extend
> procstat to show osrel.
>
> Here are patches I am going to commit if there are
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:30:05PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we can check and change binary osreldate of another process via
> procfs(5).
>
> Kostik suggested to add a new sysctl for the same purpose and also extend
> procstat to show osrel.
>
> Here are patches I am goin
Hi,
Currently we can check and change binary osreldate of another process via
procfs(5).
Kostik suggested to add a new sysctl for the same purpose and also extend
procstat to show osrel.
Here are patches I am going to commit if there are no objections or
suggestions.
http://people.freebsd.org/~
12 matches
Mail list logo
