Re: _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF

s do. What's the BSD way of doing this ? > > > > How about the hw.ncpu sysctl? > > Any objections to a patch implementing > sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) in terms of hw.ncpu ? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27489 -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF

sysctl? Any objections to a patch implementing sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF) in terms of hw.ncpu ? -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF

Arun Sharma writes: > Single UNIX spec doesn't include the above sysconf(3) argument, but > many UNIX variants do. What's the BSD way of doing this ? How about the hw.ncpu sysctl? Drew -- Andrew Gallatin, Sr System

_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF

Single UNIX spec doesn't include the above sysconf(3) argument, but many UNIX variants do. What's the BSD way of doing this ? -Arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message