Re: _ANSI_SOURCE vs. _ANSI_C_SOURCE

2001-06-01 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Farooq Mela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am wondering why some operating systems use the macro _ANSI_SOURCE > while others (ie Linux) use _ANSI_C_SOURCE to indicate that the source > compiled is ANSI-compliant (and similarly with _POSIX_SOURCE and > _POSIX_C_SOURCE). I have neither copies of t

Re: _ANSI_SOURCE vs. _ANSI_C_SOURCE

2001-06-01 Thread G. Adam Stanislav
At 20:00 31-05-2001 -0700, Farooq Mela wrote: >I am wondering why some operating systems use the macro _ANSI_SOURCE >while others (ie Linux) use _ANSI_C_SOURCE to indicate that the source >compiled is ANSI-compliant (and similarly with _POSIX_SOURCE and >_POSIX_C_SOURCE). My copy of POSIX Program

_ANSI_SOURCE vs. _ANSI_C_SOURCE

2001-05-31 Thread Farooq Mela
Hey -hackers, I am wondering why some operating systems use the macro _ANSI_SOURCE while others (ie Linux) use _ANSI_C_SOURCE to indicate that the source compiled is ANSI-compliant (and similarly with _POSIX_SOURCE and _POSIX_C_SOURCE). I have neither copies of the ANSI nor POSIX spec, and I don'