On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 01:49:36PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote:
[...]
> Now I try to do the same on a zfs partition on the same machine
> This is what I see with ls
> ---
> ls -la
> total 4
> drwxrwx--- 3 www www 4 Sep 12 13:43 .
>
Nate Eldredge wrote:
On SysV, you can get BSD-type behavior by setting the sgid bit on the
directory in question, e.g. "chmod g+s dir". Then new files will
inherit their group from the directory. I suspect this will work on
FreeBSD/ZFS too even though "chmod g+s" on a directory is undocumente
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Is the ownership of the new file decided by the open() syscall or by
the filesystem layer ?
On a superficial lookup through the sources it appears a filesystem
layer choice...
Which of the following would then be the best option (also taking POLA
into account):
* leave t
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, on Linux all the common filesystem support the SysV behaviour
> by default but have a mount option bsdgroups/grpid that turns on the BSD
> hebaviour. I would recommend you do the same just with reversed signs
> on FreeBSD. ??Having
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:36:57PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> Which of the following would then be the best option (also taking POLA
> into account):
> * leave things are they are
> * make ZFS under FreeBSD behave the way open(2) describes
> * have a new ZFS property govern the behavior an
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:18:41PM -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> >What I ask now is: is this a bug or a feature?
>
> Both, I think :)
Or none, just different implementation of the same open() function
complying with the Open Group Base Specifications ;-)
Quotting
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinep
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Nate Eldredge
wrote:
[...]
> [On UFS, files are created with the same group as the directory that
> contains them. On ZFS, they are created with the primary group of the user
> who creates them.]
>
>> What I ask now is: is this a bug or a feature?
>
> Both,
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Giulio Ferro wrote:
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not
I apologize in advance.
freebsd-questions might have been better, but I don't think you're too far
off. It wasn't necessary to post three times though :)
[On UFS, files are crea
On 09/12/2009 04:49 AM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
[...]
> How can I achieve my goal in ZFS, that is allowing members of the same
> group to operate with the files / dirs they create?
Does setting the setgid bit on the directory have any effect?
--
Benjamin Lee
http://www.b1c1l1.com/
signature.asc
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not
I apologize in advance.
I've always understood group ownership as a way to allow members of
the same group to operate on files / folders which belong to that group,
while leaving out others.
Let's suppose to have a directory
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not
I apologize in advance.
I've always understood group ownership as a way to allow members of
the same group to operate on files / folders which belong to that group,
while leaving out others.
Let's suppose to have a directory
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not
I apologize in advance.
I've always understood group ownership as a way to allow members of
the same group to operate on files / folders which belong to that group,
while leaving out others.
Let's suppose to have a directory
12 matches
Mail list logo
