On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2003 15:55, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > > In message:
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > : Anyone have any experience with P
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 15:55, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : Anyone have any experience with PC/104 or other really small
> > : footprint platorms a
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Anyone have any experience with PC/104 or other really small
> : footprint platorms and FreeBSD?
>
> Yes. Works great. We've used FreeBSD on about two dozen
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Anyone have any experience with PC/104 or other really small
: footprint platorms and FreeBSD?
Yes. Works great. We've used FreeBSD on about two dozen different
single board computers.
: We need to build a
Anyone have any experience with PC/104 or other really small
footprint platorms and FreeBSD?
We need to build a small box for equipment monitoring (temperature,
pressure diff., vibration, indication). Just a few discrete
inputs/outputs, and analog inputs would be good enough. The
hard part may b
5 matches
Mail list logo