On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Dylan Cochran wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > I did run into problems initially because my i386 userland wasn't
> > aligned with my amd64 kernel but rebuilding both fixed that (I'm
> > running 8.0-RC1 and a bit).
> >
> > N
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I did run into problems initially because my i386 userland wasn't
> aligned with my amd64 kernel but rebuilding both fixed that (I'm
> running 8.0-RC1 and a bit).
>
> Note that some tools that poke around in kernel innards won't work -
> ps an
> Note that some tools that poke around in kernel innards won't work -
> ps and lsof are the most obvious. ktrace works but the resultant
> ktrace.out files need to read with an amd64 kdump.
Some of those issues can be solved by using within 32-bit jail
statically linked 64-bit binaries. It does
On 2009-Nov-19 17:12:19 -0600, "Sam Fourman Jr." wrote:
>I would like to help get this working.. is there a howto somewhere to
>setup a i386 jail on amd64?
>I used teh instructions on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine (and pointed
>the jail to /compat/i386)
I haven't tried wine, but I do have an i386
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
> Is there any reason to fear Microsoft viruses infecting Wine programs?
In principle, yes, because Wine is supposed to be a complete
reimplementation of the win32 API, thus any program that runs
differently on Wine than on Windows demonstrates a bug in Wine.
(IIRC there are a
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote:
Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine
"FreeBSD currently lacks support for 32bit ports on a 64
ckers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Wine on amd64 in 32 bit jail - for stupid peaple only
Fulano Tal wrote:
Use IPMI to read architecture information is easy, but a nice ploy
is to sed-out i386 and amd64 related #ifdefs, and have nightmares with
chains... sorry, I mean You will have a bi-archtecture s
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote:
Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine
"FreeBSD currently lacks support for 32bit ports on a 64bit system.
Howeve
neither I believe I was sober, bleh :P
Underdog - planning to write a book now
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:43:17 -0800
> From: jul...@elischer.org
> To: gatinhodosseusson...@hotmail.com
> CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Wine on amd64 in 32 bit jail - for stu
Fulano Tal wrote:
Use IPMI to read architecture information is easy, but a nice ploy
is to sed-out i386 and amd64 related #ifdefs, and have nightmares with
chains... sorry, I mean You will have a bi-archtecture system after
some work with a cool new personalized tables compatible with 32 and
64
ot;
nevermind.
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:29:56 +
> From: xorquew...@googlemail.com
> To: sfour...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Wine on amd64 in 32 bit jail
>
> On 2009-11-19 17:12:19, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> >
> > I would like to he
On 2009-11-19 17:12:19, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>
> I would like to help get this working.. is there a howto somewhere to
> setup a i386 jail on amd64?
> I used teh instructions on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine (and pointed
> the jail to /compat/i386)
> Inside teh jail uname -a still produces this:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:57 AM, wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've done a lot of reading on this problem and don't understand why what I
> have
> doesn't work.
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine
>
> I have an entirely 32 bit jail, created by cross-compiling the world with
> TARGET=i386 and creating a jai
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:27:18AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> >On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways.
> >>One way it is exceptional is that it uses the system in a number of
> >>ways that nothi
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote:
Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways.
One way it is exceptional is that it uses the system in a number of
ways that nothing else does. For example it sets various special
segment register settings an
On 2009-11-19 12:15:18, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:36:54AM +, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
> It is in 8.0.
Excellent, thanks.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:36:54AM +, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2009-11-19 11:25:48, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > I'm using 7.2-RELEASE-p4 here.
> >
> > Required syscalls only implemented in 8/HEAD.
>
> Ah, thanks.
>
> I assume they won't have made it into 8.0-RELEASE when it sho
On 2009-11-19 11:25:48, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > I'm using 7.2-RELEASE-p4 here.
>
> Required syscalls only implemented in 8/HEAD.
Ah, thanks.
I assume they won't have made it into 8.0-RELEASE when it shows up?
xw
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mail
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:22:14AM +, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2009-11-19 11:03:41, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > You forgot to note the version of the kernel you use.
>
> I'm using 7.2-RELEASE-p4 here.
Required syscalls only implemented in 8/HEAD.
pgprTLunyoRuu.pgp
Descripti
On 2009-11-19 11:03:41, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> You forgot to note the version of the kernel you use.
I'm using 7.2-RELEASE-p4 here.
xw
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubsc
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:38:18AM +, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways.
> > One way it is exceptional is that it uses the system in a number of
> > ways that nothing else does. For exam
On 2009-11-18 23:19:14, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Wine is an exceptional bit of software, in many ways.
> One way it is exceptional is that it uses the system in a number of
> ways that nothing else does. For example it sets various special
> segment register settings and defines several differen
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello.
I've done a lot of reading on this problem and don't understand why what I have
doesn't work.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine
I have an entirely 32 bit jail, created by cross-compiling the world with
TARGET=i386 and creating a jail from DESTDIR.
The jail
Hello.
I've done a lot of reading on this problem and don't understand why what I have
doesn't work.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine
I have an entirely 32 bit jail, created by cross-compiling the world with
TARGET=i386 and creating a jail from DESTDIR.
The jail appears to be fully functional - a
24 matches
Mail list logo
