On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:33:19PM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:30 +0200
> Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
>
> > The C standard specifies that both and shall
> > define WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX. You cannot simply include
> > from because the former contains a lot
> > of oth
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:30 +0200
Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > Along with this WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX are defined both in
> > and . I would like to remove the copy
> > from wchar.h and add an include to machine/_stdint.h.
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
> Hello hackers@
>
> I'm working on getting FreeBSD working with the ARM EABI. As part of
> this the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture (AAPCS)
> defines wchar_t as an unsigned int.
Does someone at ARM actually get paid
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
> Along with this WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX are defined both in
> and . I would like to remove the copy from wchar.h
> and add an include to machine/_stdint.h.
>
> Would there be any problems with either of these or is there a better
>
Hello hackers@
I'm working on getting FreeBSD working with the ARM EABI. As part of
this the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture (AAPCS)
defines wchar_t as an unsigned int.
Looking at sys/sys/_types.h rune_t, wchar_t and wint_t are of type
__ct_rune_t which is an int. Furthermore as
5 matches
Mail list logo