>
> There is a story behind it: our product was shipping for hpux
> and was later ported to sinix. It had some instabilities during
> development (it was first developed for hpux, then the enhancements were
> ported to sinix, almost in parallel).
>
> A colleague wrote (paraphrased)
> pointer->pointer->object.method;
>
> where he wanted
>
> pointer->pointer->object.method();
>
> hpux CC did not say a word. Naturally, the method had desired
> side effects :)
Port your application to see more compiler warnings. It sounds like
perl -e 'use strict
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Hibma [SMTP:nick.hi...@jrc.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 2:27 PM
> To: Ladavac Marino
> Cc: FreeBSD hackers mailing list
> Subject: RE: Typo: sys/pci/pcisupport.c
> It does, just no one checking. Someone needs to go and
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Daniel Baker wrote:
> 4.0-CURRENT: sys/pci/pcisupport.c:
>
> 955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 &/
> 956:case 0x05861106: /* south bridge section */
> 957:return ("VIA 82C586 PCI-ISA bridge");
>
> This is cute. Moo.
Fixed. Thanks.
- b
> > 955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 &/
> > 956:case 0x05861106: /* south bridge section */
> > 957:return ("VIA 82C586 PCI-ISA bridge");
> >
> > This is cute. Moo.
> [ML] Yes. A comment-within-a-comment compiler warning would
> have been nice
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Baker [SMTP:dba...@cuckoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 1999 5:12 AM
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Typo: sys/pci/pcisupport.c
>
> 4.0-CURRENT: sys/pci/pcisupport.c:
>
> 955:/* VIA Technologie
4.0-CURRENT: sys/pci/pcisupport.c:
955:/* VIA Technologies -- vendor 0x1106 &/
956:case 0x05861106: /* south bridge section */
957:return ("VIA 82C586 PCI-ISA bridge");
This is cute. Moo.
Daniel
--
dba...@cuckoo.com - Senior CuckooNet Consultant - http://www.cu
7 matches
Mail list logo
