Re: The path is now set for "busybox", FreeBSD style

2010-11-16 Thread Adrian Chadd
Nope. it's easy. That's why I've done it. Adrian On 15 November 2010 01:43, John Hein wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote at 11:40 +0800 on Nov 14, 2010: > > I've committed the below changes to -HEAD. You can now create and build > your > > own busybox style binary system, completely cross-compiled

Re: The path is now set for "busybox", FreeBSD style

2010-11-15 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On 14 Nov 2010, at 03:40, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've committed the below changes to -HEAD. You can now create and build your > own busybox style binary system, completely cross-compiled within the > existing Make framework. It isn't as impressive as it sounds though - a lot > of the framework is

Re: The path is now set for "busybox", FreeBSD style

2010-11-14 Thread John Hein
Adrian Chadd wrote at 11:40 +0800 on Nov 14, 2010: > I've committed the below changes to -HEAD. You can now create and build your > own busybox style binary system, completely cross-compiled within the > existing Make framework. It isn't as impressive as it sounds though - a lot > of the framew

The path is now set for "busybox", FreeBSD style

2010-11-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi everyone, I've committed the below changes to -HEAD. You can now create and build your own busybox style binary system, completely cross-compiled within the existing Make framework. It isn't as impressive as it sounds though - a lot of the framework is already there from just building crunchgen