Re: The 'ln -s' command

2006-05-24 Thread David Malone
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:21:59AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I tried the 'ln -s' command in bothe 4.3 & 4.7 in a situation > where it should fail and it did, but it still had a return/exit > code of 0 , I think it should have been nonzero. I tried 'ln

Re: The 'ln -s' command

2006-05-23 Thread Sam Lawrance
On 24/05/2006, at 11:42 AM, Sam Lawrance wrote: On 24/05/2006, at 1:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried the 'ln -s' command in bothe 4.3 & 4.7 in a situation where it should fail and it did, but it still had a return/exit code of 0 , I think it should have been non

Re: The 'ln -s' command

2006-05-23 Thread Sam Lawrance
On 24/05/2006, at 1:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried the 'ln -s' command in bothe 4.3 & 4.7 in a situation where it should fail and it did, but it still had a return/exit code of 0 , I think it should have been nonzero. I tried 'ln -s a b' where the f

Re: The 'ln -s' command

2006-05-23 Thread Joseph Koshy
I tried the 'ln -s' command in bothe 4.3 & 4.7 in a situation where it should fail and it did, but it still had a return/exit code of 0 , I think it should have been nonzero. I tried 'ln -s a b' where the file b existed (and was a directory) and I wanted to creat

Re: The 'ln -s' command

2006-05-23 Thread John-Mark Gurney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:21 +: > I tried the 'ln -s' command in bothe 4.3 & 4.7 in a situation where it > should fail and it did, but it still had a return/exit code of 0 , I think > it should have been nonzero. I tried '

The 'ln -s' command

2006-05-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried the 'ln -s' command in bothe 4.3 & 4.7 in a situation where it should fail and it did, but it still had a return/exit code of 0 , I think it should have been nonzero. I tried 'ln -s a b' where the file b existed (and was a directory) and I wanted to