* Michael C . Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010102 23:07] wrote:
> [If need be, please add Cc: to -net]
>
> While doing my own research project, I came across this piece
> of information. It seems like a "nobody-has-it-but-it-is-fast" thing.
>
> http://www.psc.edu/networking/ftp/papers/draft-ratehalv
>Is this specified in the IPv6 specs? Does KAME do this?
I don't think so. TCP on IPv6 is exactly the same as TCP on IPv4.
only differences I know of are in the following portion:
(1) pseudo-header checksum documented in in RFC2460 section 8.1
(2) jumbogram suppor
[If need be, please add Cc: to -net]
While doing my own research project, I came across this piece
of information. It seems like a "nobody-has-it-but-it-is-fast" thing.
http://www.psc.edu/networking/ftp/papers/draft-ratehalving.txt
It seeks to improve the Reno TCP implementation by the most
re
3 matches
Mail list logo
