Vinum encapsulating existing partitions (was: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning)

2000-03-16 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 9 March 2000 at 11:12:21 +1030, Mark Newton wrote: > > Another thing which would be useful is the ability to "vinum-ize" an > existing filesystem without destroying it first. On Solaris and > IRIX I can do that by creating a logical volume with a single plex > which just happens to

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-16 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 8 March 2000 at 8:15:26 -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > "Koster, K.J." wrote: >> >> Also, I'd really love to be able to configure ccd stripe sets from >> sysinstall, but I would not be surprised if that was too much to ask. :) > > Being able to configure vinum slices would be nice, too.

Re: Vinum encapsulating existing partitions (was: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning)

2000-03-14 Thread Mark Newton
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 12:12:17PM -0800, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Thursday, 9 March 2000 at 11:12:21 +1030, Mark Newton wrote: > > > Another thing which would be useful is the ability to "vinum-ize" an > > existing filesystem without destroying it first. On Solaris and > > IRIX I can do th

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Nik Clayton
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 03:25:33AM +0300, Aleksandr A.Babaylov wrote: > Yes, it's good. > But it's better just mount partition on it's own place, no symlinks, I disagree. > such as: > /dev/sd1s1f 3942238 2151773 147508659%/usr > /dev/sd0s1g98553538016 868677 4%/usr/

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Aleksandr A.Babaylov
Nik Clayton writes: > Recommended disk and partition layout > > In order to reduce space wastage, and provide a flexible partition layout > for future work, the following disk partition layout is recommended. > > First, you need three 'standard' filesystems, of roughly th

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Brian Beattie
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > "Andrey" == Andrey Sverdlichenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> /tmp softlink to /var/tmp (because having two tmp's is stupid) > > Andrey> What if /var can't be mounted after crash? /tmp should be > Andrey> on root filesystem.

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> "Andrey" == Andrey Sverdlichenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> /tmp softlink to /var/tmp (because having two tmp's is stupid) Andrey> What if /var can't be mounted after crash? /tmp should be Andrey> on root filesystem. Just create an underlying /var/tmp on the root filesyste

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Wes Peters
Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: > : Being able to configure vinum slices would be nice, too. Especially > : once Greg commits support for booting from vinum volumes. Think about > : booting from mirrored volumes for reliability. > > Having vinum support

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 9:25 PM -0500 3/8/00, Colin wrote: > I might be completely out in left field somewhere, but I don't >see that the defaults should be that important. We're discussing >what is fundamentally a server oriented system, and realistically >we have to assume some minimum level of understanding on

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-09 Thread Andrey Sverdlichenko
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > /tmp softlink to /var/tmp(because having two tmp's is stupid) What if /var can't be mounted after crash? /tmp should be on root filesystem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of t

Re: New packaging system (was: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning)

2000-03-08 Thread Doug Barton
Kenny Drobnack wrote: > I have a suggestion. I have a laptop with Debian Linux on it, and I love > the way it does the packaging system. We have command line tools to do all the things you described, and sysinstall is a GUI front end to the existing package system. As for wish lists, th

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Colin
On 08-Mar-2000 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > And as you've seen by subsequent discussion, it's impossible > to derive a "one size fits all" solution for something like /var. > > I would expect this to come out of the "I know where you want it, now > what kind of install will this be?" question whic

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Mark Newton
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 05:30:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Having vinum support in sysinstall would cut into my consulting > business :-). "Oh, sorry, let's not do that then!" :-) > Setting up a mirrored system is hard enough that people > are hiring consultants to do it. Yes, I have t

Re: New packaging system (was: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning)

2000-03-08 Thread Kenny Drobnack
> > I was actually planning a near-complete rewrite of sysinstall anyway! How > > about everyone throwing in whatever suggestions you would like ( about > > anything regarding sysinstall ), and I will try to incorporate them!? > > It has already been re-written, complete with the new packaging s

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: : Being able to configure vinum slices would be nice, too. Especially : once Greg commits support for booting from vinum volumes. Think about : booting from mirrored volumes for reliability. Having vinum support in sysinstall would cut into my c

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Nik Clayton
This looks like as good a place as any to hang this; On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 09:14:34PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I'll tell ya, I *never* use the auto-defaults. They are way too > tiny. A 50MB root barely fits the kernel and you can run it out of > space doing an installworld.

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Mar-00 Edward Gold wrote: > Mike Walker wrote: > >> > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see >> > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: >> > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y >> > wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP >> > wd0s1e/var

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Oliver Fromme
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > I'll tell ya, I *never* use the auto-defaults. Me neither. :-) > They are way too > tiny. A 50MB root barely fits the kernel and you can run it out of > space doing an installworld. I almost always do this

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Jamie Bowden
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: :"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: :> > Or are you saying that the newbie option would just use the :> > entire disk as one partition (the way that MacOS 10 server :> > does...)? :> No, that's evil for a lot of reasons which I won't go into here. :) :I don'

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > > No, that's evil for a lot of reasons which I won't go into here. :) > > > > I don't agree... A small /, and a huge /usr, with an additional var > > Not surprising since you're not even arguing with the point I was > making. :) I said that a big / was evil. If

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> > No, that's evil for a lot of reasons which I won't go into here. :) > > I don't agree... A small /, and a huge /usr, with an additional var Not surprising since you're not even arguing with the point I was making. :) I said that a big / was evil. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > > The first time I installed freebsd, I picked numbers that were > > a little larger than the defaults for '/' and '/var', and still > > found myself needing to redo the entire installation in less > > than a week because /var was too small. That was fine enough >

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Wes Peters
"Koster, K.J." wrote: > > Also, I'd really love to be able to configure ccd stripe sets from > sysinstall, but I would not be surprised if that was too much to ask. :) Being able to configure vinum slices would be nice, too. Especially once Greg commits support for booting from vinum volumes.

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> The first time I installed freebsd, I picked numbers that were > a little larger than the defaults for '/' and '/var', and still > found myself needing to redo the entire installation in less > than a week because /var was too small. That was fine enough And as you've seen by subsequent discus

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 3:06 AM -0800 3/8/00, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > For complete newbies, having "two formatting menus" seems weird > > too, and may be confusing. (I'm quoting one of my housemates). > >For complete newbies, you really only want to ask one question up-front: > >"Do you want to use all availa

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> For the level above that (and I count myself here) a merged menu might just > be more user friendly. And I don't disagree. The only thing which prevented me from merging them to begin with was the fact that dialog/curses represent an insufficiently advanced UI technology for taking adequate ad

RE: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Koster, K.J.
> > "Do you want to use all available disk space for > FreeBSD?" > For complete newbies this is indeed better than my suggestion. For the level above that (and I count myself here) a merged menu might just be more user friendly. Kees Jan ==

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> For complete newbies, having "two formatting menus" seems weird too, and may > be confusing. (I'm quoting one of my housemates). For complete newbies, you really only want to ask one question up-front: "Do you want to use all available disk space for FreeBSD?" If the answer is yes, you go

RE: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-08 Thread Koster, K.J.
> > I was actually planning a near-complete rewrite of sysinstall > anyway! How > about everyone throwing in whatever suggestions you would like ( about > anything regarding sysinstall ), and I will try to incorporate them!? > Well, I've been toying with ideas on how to integrate the disklabel

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:06:24AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: :> Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: :> > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see :> > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: :> > wd0s1a/ 50MB

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:06:24AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see > > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: > > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Bottom line: I think it should stay the way it is now. :-) And since I agree, I suspect it will. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Oliver Fromme
Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y > wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP > wd0s1e/var

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Edward Gold
Mike Walker wrote: > > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see > > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: > > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y > > wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP > > wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y > > wd0s1f/usr 18

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Mike Walker
> I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y > wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP > wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y > wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y > > the /var one s

Re: Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Luke Hollins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000307 17:49] wrote: > I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see > what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: > wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y > wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP > wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y >

Sysinstall 'A'uto partitioning

2000-03-07 Thread Luke Hollins
I was using sysinstall the other day and hit Auto defaults just to see what it suggested, and got this on a 20GB disk: wd0s1a/ 50MB UFS Y wd0s1bswap 651MB SWAP wd0s1e/var20MB UFS Y wd0s1f/usr 18849MB UFS Y the /var one struck me as real