On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:34:36 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> It suddenly occured to me while I was testing this that I might be
> going to a lot of trouble under the misguided assumption that a fork is
> expensive. Am I wrong?
Please disregard my previous post. I was working around a bug I
introd
One of the nice things about Unix has always been low process-spawning overhead.
FreeBSD should do quite well, especially, since it is demand-paged and a fork
doesn't actually copy much, just the vm map and makes everything COW.
Brian Feldman_ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
gr...@uni
Hi folks,
I'm currently working on our libwrap support in inetd. Working with the
originators of a few PR's, I've come up with a diff that gets most of
what we need right, including the severity option of hosts_options.
I'm taking on hosts_options' twist now. The problem with twist is that
it ex
3 matches
Mail list logo
