Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-06 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Matthew Jacob wrote ... > > > Another interesting cause for problems is duff powersupplies. As the > > proverb goes "every machine is as good as it's PSU". E.g. I just struggeled > > with a DLT tape unit that inexplicable reset itself. After examining the > > 5Volts rail with a scope I found g

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-06 Thread Matthew Dillon
:>treatment, in roughly this order: :> :>3a) Complete check of all cables and the seating of connectors. :> :>3b) Examination of the drive(s) in question for any cooling or :>mounting deficiencies. Depending on the SCSI errors in question, :>I might even investigate

Re: Sv: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Leif Neland wrote: > > > > > If it already hasn't been done, we should capture the procedure that > > Jordan posted, added to by Matt and maybe post it to the troubleshooting > > part of the guide(s). > > > > > > Unlike some of us who've been fooling with computers since

Sv: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Leif Neland
> > If it already hasn't been done, we should capture the procedure that > Jordan posted, added to by Matt and maybe post it to the troubleshooting > part of the guide(s). > > > Unlike some of us who've been fooling with computers since pre-1985, this > standard operating procedure may not be

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kelly Yancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>3b) Examination of the drive(s) in question for any cooling or >>mounting deficiencies. Depending on the SCSI errors in question, >>I might even investigate firmware updates for the drive(s). >>

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Matthew Jacob
> Another interesting cause for problems is duff powersupplies. As the > proverb goes "every machine is as good as it's PSU". E.g. I just struggeled > with a DLT tape unit that inexplicable reset itself. After examining the > 5Volts rail with a scope I found glitches on it whenever the drive did

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Kelly Yancey wrote ... > > > >3b) Examination of the drive(s) in question for any cooling or > >mounting deficiencies. Depending on the SCSI errors in question, > >I might even investigate firmware updates for the drive(s). > > > > I actually used to get these *exact*

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Dan Seguin
> >1. It's quite possible that the drive and/or the cabling in this > > system has been defective all along. > > I suspect not, based upon the history. > > I think that the drive and/or controler has just developed this sickness > within the past 24 hours. > > >2. It's equally possible that

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "... even though I used it on Linux for several months." >> >> I read that as meaning "the drive worked despite the fact that it was on >> Linux". > >Well, just to inject a note of reality into this discussion: >

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> The controller is an AHA-2940U (not wide). The da0 disk is a Quantum >> Viking 4.5GB SCSI. I have never had any problem with this drive before, >> even though I used it

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Matthew Jacob
> 3. Any system I saw spitting out errors like this would get the following >treatment, in roughly this order: > >3a) Complete check of all cables and the seating of connectors. > >3b) Examination of the drive(s) in question for any cooling or >mounting deficiencies. Dependi

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Kelly Yancey
> >3b) Examination of the drive(s) in question for any cooling or >mounting deficiencies. Depending on the SCSI errors in question, >I might even investigate firmware updates for the drive(s). > I actually used to get these *exact* errors a couple of years ago on various

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> "... even though I used it on Linux for several months." > > I read that as meaning "the drive worked despite the fact that it was on > Linux". Well, just to inject a note of reality into this discussion: 1. It's quite possible that the drive and/or the cabling in this system has been defe

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Dan Seguin
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > The controller is an AHA-2940U (not wide). The da0 disk is a Quantum > > Viking 4.5GB SCSI. I have never had any problem with this drive before, > > even though I used it on Linux for several mo

Re: Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > The controller is an AHA-2940U (not wide). The da0 disk is a Quantum > Viking 4.5GB SCSI. I have never had any problem with this drive before, > even though I used it on Linux for several months. > > This (FreeBSD) system has been running just f

Strange SCSI sickness

1999-12-05 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
My apologies for posting this digression from the usual weighty matters that are discussed here on -hackers, but I'm really in a tizzy about this. Going through my waiting mail this morning (on my personal desktop system named `segfault.monkeys.com') I found the following message from the nightl