Re: Status of base GDB

2007-06-08 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 6/8/07, Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:15 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is > > there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking thre

Re: Status of base GDB

2007-06-08 Thread Tom Evans
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:15 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is > > there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc > > changes (although I can't re

Re: Status of base GDB

2007-06-07 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc changes (although I can't remember this kind of situation representing a setback in other BSDs' case). Than

Status of base GDB

2007-06-07 Thread Vlad GALU
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc changes (although I can't remember this kind of situation representing a setback in other BSDs' case). Thanks. -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's rea