On Nov 19, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Devin Teske wrote:
>
So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
spinner function compatible with many shells.
DONE=$( /bin/sh -c 'read -t 0 DONE; echo $DONE' )
>>>
>>> Is
Devin Teske wrote:
> >> So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
> >> spinner function compatible with many shells.
> >>DONE=$( /bin/sh -c 'read -t 0 DONE; echo $DONE' )
> >
> > Is this expected to be portable to other operating systems? The d
On Nov 13, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> Hi fellow hackers... I come with baring gifts!
>>
>> So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
>> spinner function compatible with many shells.
>>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi fellow hackers... I come with baring gifts!
>
> So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
> spinner function compatible with many shells.
> DONE=$( /bin/sh -c 'read -t 0 DONE; echo $DONE' )
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:12 -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi fellow hackers... I come with baring gifts!
>
> So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
> spinner function compatible with many shells.
>
> But, before I get into the code, let me first explain that going to
One-line fix for a small bug (see below).
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 12:12 -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi fellow hackers... I come with baring gifts!
>
> So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
> spinner function compatible with many shells.
>
> But, before I get into th
Hi fellow hackers... I come with baring gifts!
So, just as the subject-line says, ... here's an efficient and robust
spinner function compatible with many shells.
But, before I get into the code, let me first explain that going to
Google and searching for "spinner shell script" results in 100+
di
7 matches
Mail list logo
