On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:18:38PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
>
> Interesting. How would you have a key bound sequence in mutt set off
> the script on the message, though? For instance, if I do a "ctrl+B", how
> would you ensure that the Right Thing happens, without modifying mutt
> code?
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> Hey, this is awesome stuff! Thanks! How come we don't have a port?
I've been busy. ;-)
Feel free to do the port if you get time before I do.
Brandon D. Valentine
--
http://www.geekpunk.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++[>++<-]>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:27:24PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:10:39PM -0700, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> >> This shouldn't be hard to glue together without modifying mutt itself.
> >> Make a little program, foo, that t
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:18:38PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> Interesting. How would you have a key bound sequence in mutt set off
> the script on the message, though? For instance, if I do a "ctrl+B", how
> would you ensure that the Right Thing happens, without modifying mutt
> code?
By
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:10:39PM -0700, Matthew Hunt wrote:
>> This shouldn't be hard to glue together without modifying mutt itself.
>> Make a little program, foo, that takes the message on stdin, passes
>> it through "formail -x subject", massages it
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:10:39PM -0700, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:24:54PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> > cool if mutt did it). What this does is pretty straightforward: I see
> > a thread with subject "foo." I don't like it. I really don't like it.
> > I hit a key
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:24:54PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> cool if mutt did it). What this does is pretty straightforward: I see
> a thread with subject "foo." I don't like it. I really don't like it.
> I hit a key combination such as, I don't know, CTRL+B (or something not
> bound yet),
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:36:41PM -0500, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:24:54PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Two ideas have come up recently to extend the features of the mutt(1)
> > Email client. I'm not one who has hacked on mutt, nor who really
> > inte
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:24:54PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Two ideas have come up recently to extend the features of the mutt(1)
> Email client. I'm not one who has hacked on mutt, nor who really
> intends to (if I can avoid it, I will), so hence the reason for this
> post.
I
Hi,
Two ideas have come up recently to extend the features of the mutt(1)
Email client. I'm not one who has hacked on mutt, nor who really
intends to (if I can avoid it, I will), so hence the reason for this
post.
So this post is directed at those people who have some extra time on
their ha
10 matches
Mail list logo