On 07/01/2006, at 12:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Does the attached patch look reasonable?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Index: sh.1
===
RCS file: /usr/local/ncvs/src/bin/sh/sh.1,v
retrieving revisio
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:57:17PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Sam Lawrance wrote:
>
> >It's already mentioned at the end of the list of formats.
>
> Hrrm, so it is. Arguably it should be mentioned at the start, since it's
> easy to miss where it is (I certainly missed it, as did others).
If yo
Sam Lawrance wrote:
It's already mentioned at the end of the list of formats.
Hrrm, so it is. Arguably it should be mentioned at the start, since it's
easy to miss where it is (I certainly missed it, as did others).
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
__
Does the attached patch look reasonable?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Index: sh.1
===
RCS file: /usr/local/ncvs/src/bin/sh/sh.1,v
retrieving revision 1.118
diff -u -r1.118 sh.1
--- sh.11 Jan 20
4 matches
Mail list logo