Re: SW_WATCHDOG vs new eventtimer code

2011-09-21 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 21/09/2011 11:40 Alexander Motin said the following: > It looks like your system was out for about 15 seconds or for some > reason system uptime jumped 15 seconds forward. Have you done anything > special at the moment or have you seen anything strange in system > behavior? Nope. I just looked

Re: SW_WATCHDOG vs new eventtimer code

2011-09-21 Thread Alexander Motin
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/09/2011 23:04 Alexander Motin said the following: >> On 20.09.2011 22:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> just want to check with you first if the following makes sense. >>> I use SW_WATCHDOG on one of the test machines, which was recently updated to >>> from stable/8 to head.

Re: SW_WATCHDOG vs new eventtimer code

2011-09-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 20/09/2011 23:04 Alexander Motin said the following: > Hi. > > On 20.09.2011 22:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> just want to check with you first if the following makes sense. >> I use SW_WATCHDOG on one of the test machines, which was recently updated to >> from stable/8 to head. Now it seems to g

Re: SW_WATCHDOG vs new eventtimer code

2011-09-20 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. On 20.09.2011 22:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: > just want to check with you first if the following makes sense. > I use SW_WATCHDOG on one of the test machines, which was recently updated to > from stable/8 to head. Now it seems to get seemingly random watchdog events. > My theory is that this is

SW_WATCHDOG vs new eventtimer code

2011-09-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
Alexander, just want to check with you first if the following makes sense. I use SW_WATCHDOG on one of the test machines, which was recently updated to from stable/8 to head. Now it seems to get seemingly random watchdog events. My theory is that this is because of the eventtimer logic. If durin