Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-21 Thread Mark Johnston
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:53:44PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > All > So Xin's patch works so far I see no unexpected issues; can I get a MFC ? > Also on a unrelated MFC request would someone be willing to merge > stable/7/sys/netinet/tcp_input.cr246999 into 6-STABLE . This cleanly > applied and

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-21 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/21/13 10:53, Mark Saad wrote: > All So Xin's patch works so far I see no unexpected issues; can I > get a MFC ? Also on a unrelated MFC request would someone be > willing to merge stable/7/sys/netinet/tcp_input.cr246999 into > 6-STABLE . Th

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-21 Thread Mark Johnston
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:53:44PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > All > So Xin's patch works so far I see no unexpected issues; can I get a MFC ? > Also on a unrelated MFC request would someone be willing to merge > stable/7/sys/netinet/tcp_input.cr246999 into 6-STABLE . This cleanly > applied and

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-21 Thread Mark Saad
All So Xin's patch works so far I see no unexpected issues; can I get a MFC ? Also on a unrelated MFC request would someone be willing to merge stable/7/sys/netinet/tcp_input.cr246999 into 6-STABLE . This cleanly applied and I saw no issues. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wr

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 20 February 2013 12:01, Mark Saad wrote: > Xin > I am rebuilding now, I'll let you know how it works. As I've said before, if someone wants to take ownership of 6.x and backport changes / push them into STABLE_6, be my guest. Yahoo was doing that for some unsupported old releases for a while.

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Saad
Xin I am rebuilding now, I'll let you know how it works. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Xin Li wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 02/20/13 09:29, Mark Saad wrote: > > All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc > > applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/20/13 09:29, Mark Saad wrote: > All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc > applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the > 6-STABLE branch ? The patch itself won't apply, there were many changes after th

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Fleuriot Damien
My point was, unless someone ports the patch back to 6 , if 6 is indeed affected, I think you're out of luck. I hope you get your answer and, possibly, a patch. On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Mark Saad wrote: > I am aware its EOL'd but there are still a number of us stuck with 6-STABLE > . > >

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Saad
I am aware its EOL'd but there are still a number of us stuck with 6-STABLE . On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup > > 6 has been EOL for a looong time. > > So hmmm, guessing you won't see a patch. > > > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:29 PM, M

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Fleuriot Damien
http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup 6 has been EOL for a looong time. So hmmm, guessing you won't see a patch. On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Mark Saad wrote: > All > I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc applies to > FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the

SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Saad
All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the 6-STABLE branch ? -- mark saad | nones...@longcount.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or