Bjorn Danielsson wrote:
>
> Jim Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 3.3 Box is a local server on a disconnected LAN talking
> > to a "remote" server that spools mail, which is grabbed by
> > fetchmail. We are running PPP on-demand to the external
> > server via a dial-up to an ISP. However,
Andy Farkas wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Jim Durham wrote:
>
> > The 3.3 Box is a local server on a disconnected LAN talking
> > to a "remote" server that spools mail, which is grabbed by
> > fetchmail. We are running PPP on-demand to the external
> > server via a dial-up to an ISP. However,
Jim Durham wrote:
> Something in the daily scripts seemed to eliminate the
> first line, containing the local nameserver. I say this
> because the file date was 1:59am, the time that periodic/daily
> runs. I put it back every day, and the next day, it was gone again.
>
> I hunted quite a while i
On 17-Dec-99 Jim Durham wrote:
> Mike Smith wrote:
>>
>> > Something in the daily scripts seemed to eliminate the
>> > first line, containing the local nameserver. I say this
>> > because the file date was 1:59am, the time that periodic/daily
>> > runs. I put it back every day, and the next day,
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 08:36:41PM -0500, Jim Durham wrote:
> I posted this to -questions, but didn't really
> get any answer that seemed to fit, so I thought
> I would ask here.
>
> On a 3.3-RELEASE box, not realizing at first that
> I didn't need an entry for the local nameserver, I
> had it's
Jim Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 3.3 Box is a local server on a disconnected LAN talking
> to a "remote" server that spools mail, which is grabbed by
> fetchmail. We are running PPP on-demand to the external
> server via a dial-up to an ISP. However, PPP only holds the
> line up from 8a
> > > Just for the sake of my curiosity, what was modifiying
> > > resolv.conf? Is this a security feature?
Ran into a similar "what's changing this file?" problem a while ago --
fstat(1) is your friend...
#!/bin/sh
while true
do
fstat /etc/resolv.conf >> /fstatlogfile
done
Throw that int
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Something in the daily scripts seemed to eliminate the
> > first line, containing the local nameserver. I say this
> > because the file date was 1:59am, the time that periodic/daily
> > runs. I put it back every day, and the next day, it was gone again.
> >
> > I hunted qu
> Something in the daily scripts seemed to eliminate the
> first line, containing the local nameserver. I say this
> because the file date was 1:59am, the time that periodic/daily
> runs. I put it back every day, and the next day, it was gone again.
>
> I hunted quite a while in the scripts, but c
I posted this to -questions, but didn't really
get any answer that seemed to fit, so I thought
I would ask here.
On a 3.3-RELEASE box, not realizing at first that
I didn't need an entry for the local nameserver, I
had it's IP in as the first line in resolv.conf, followed
by two more nameservers o
10 matches
Mail list logo
