RE: Repeated softupdates panics in 3.3-STABLE

2000-01-03 Thread Jason Young
Title: RE: Repeated softupdates panics in 3.3-STABLE A "pending ops" panic can be induced in fairly short order by running the SMTP performance tests that come with Postfix. Specifically, run smtpstone/smtp-source running many parallel deliveries into a Postfix mail daemon setup

Re: Repeated softupdates panics in 3.3-STABLE

2000-01-03 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Well, in Keith's case the locking-against-myself panic is not the :cause, but the effect of the 'softdep_fsync: pending ops' panic :that occured just before it. : :I've never seeing a pending ops panic before, this is going to be :one for Kirk to track down. Be sure to keep

Re: Repeated softupdates panics in 3.3-STABLE

2000-01-03 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On 03/01 16:29, Keith Stevenson wrote: : :> It looks like I may have spoken too soon when I mentioned that I had no :> problems with softupdates on my postfix based mail server. I have now had :> two panics in the last month with a panicstr of "softdep_lock: locking :> against myself". I though

Re: Repeated softupdates panics in 3.3-STABLE

2000-01-03 Thread George Cox
On 03/01 16:29, Keith Stevenson wrote: > It looks like I may have spoken too soon when I mentioned that I had no > problems with softupdates on my postfix based mail server. I have now had > two panics in the last month with a panicstr of "softdep_lock: locking > against myself". I thought that

Repeated softupdates panics in 3.3-STABLE

2000-01-03 Thread Keith Stevenson
(Matt: I've cc'd you since you seem to have taken an interest in softupdates. If you would prefer that I not cc you directly in the future, let me know and it won't happen again.) I'm posting to -hackers, since my last post of this type to stable didn't seem to attract any attention. It looks l