Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-12-06 Thread .
Joerg Schilling writes: > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 00:41:54 2001 > > >Joerg Schilling writes: > >. > >> STAR OptionDescription > Gnu tar equiv. Remarks > >> ======

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-12-06 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 00:41:54 2001 >Joerg Schilling writes: >. >> STAR Option Description Gnu >tar equiv. Remarks >> === === >=

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-12-05 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 00:41:54 2001 >. >> STAR Option Description Gnu >tar equiv. Remarks >> === === >= === >. >> file=nm,

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-12-05 Thread .
Joerg Schilling writes: . > STAR Option Description Gnu >tar equiv. Remarks > === === >= === . > file=nm,f=nm use 'nm' as tape inste

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-12-05 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 20:27:24 2001 >On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:07:03PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: >> >> - An idiosyncratic build system. >> >> This is really funny >Please don't waste time on this issue. I can bmake and shoe-horn >anything into our build system. Right, th

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-12-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:07:03PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >> - An idiosyncratic build system. > > This is really funny Please don't waste time on this issue. I can bmake and shoe-horn anything into our build system. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-11-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 21:25:58 2001 >> >> Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling >> >> _may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead >> >> of keeping a real tar? >> >> >Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-11-29 Thread Nate Williams
> >> Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling > >> _may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead > >> of keeping a real tar? > > >Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was > >created. > > Well this is from BSD-4.3: [ SNIP

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-11-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 21:11:16 2001 >> Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling >> _may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead >> of keeping a real tar? >Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was >created.

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-11-29 Thread Nate Williams
> Of course, if you only know GNUtar Star's standard option handling > _may_ look strange. But then why did FreBSD switch to GNUtar instead > of keeping a real tar? Because there didn't exist a real tar at the time that FreeBSD was created. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: tar and nodump flag (fwd)

2001-11-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From: fergus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Perhaps it makes sense to switch to star instead? The last version is >> > Posix conform, supports extended headers and ACLs. According to the star >> > developer (Joerg Schilling) GNU tar is severly broken. >> >> Unfortunately, star has it's own share of pr