On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:43:51PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:49:46AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > ...
> > > HZ is set to 5000; the machine is intended to process several tens of
> > > thousands of very small packets per
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:49:46AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> ...
> > HZ is set to 5000; the machine is intended to process several tens of
> > thousands of very small packets per second, and interrupt processing was a
> > big problem.
>
> why don't yo
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:49:46AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
...
> HZ is set to 5000; the machine is intended to process several tens of
> thousands of very small packets per second, and interrupt processing was a
> big problem.
why don't you use "options DEVICE_POLLING" then :)
> Does this mea
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:49:56AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > I'm probably doing something basic wrong, but I'm getting a very
> > inconsistent response when using setsockopt to set the SO_RCVTIMEO to
> > seven seconds or more.
>
> i would suspect so
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:49:56AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> I'm probably doing something basic wrong, but I'm getting a very
> inconsistent response when using setsockopt to set the SO_RCVTIMEO to
> seven seconds or more.
i would suspect some overflow of 16-bit fields used to store
the timeou
5 matches
Mail list logo
