On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:17:53 +1100 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My times are with some small improvements which I think don't affect
> the tests much (they affect latency more than throughput). With lots
> of small files (smaller than the block size), clustering doesn't makes
>
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Tomas Pluskal wrote:
> I believe that everybody here knows about the "slow msdosfs" problem, that
> is AFAIK caused by implementation without clustering.
Which problem. msdosfs has a number of small problems. Mostly they don't
matter.
> For me this is very annoying, becaus
2 matches
Mail list logo
