Fwd: Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Andrew Lankford
E-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:37:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from i...@bsdimp.com) Subject:Re: scd and mcd Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-1024646444 From:

Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 23, 2011, at 5:19 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Warner Losh wrote: > >> mcd and scd are ISA-only devices ... They were important for the >> 386 (now not supported) and 486 machines. Since the 486 machines >> in question maxed out at 32MB, and 8.x has trouble running in 32MB >> on x

Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread perryh
Warner Losh wrote: > mcd and scd are ISA-only devices ... They were important for the > 386 (now not supported) and 486 machines. Since the 486 machines > in question maxed out at 32MB, and 8.x has trouble running in 32MB > on x86, I'm guessing there aren't too many 486 SX/DX machines > running

Re: scd and mcd

2011-04-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Lankford wrote: > While we're talking about recent MFC's for SATA hardware (works for me, but I > still need the old ata drivers for my cdrom), is anyone out there really > still using the mcd (fbsd 1.0 vintage) and scd (2.0.5) drivers? mcd and scd are ISA-o