On 6/10/02 6:07 PM, "Terry Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> You quite speak for yourself. I've seen the FreeBSD community more split
>> 50%-50% in their love-hate of Vinum. Many of us still use ccd(4) because
>> Vinum did not meet our needs.
>
> Alfred Perlsteing c
David O'Brien wrote:
> You quite speak for yourself. I've seen the FreeBSD community more split
> 50%-50% in their love-hate of Vinum. Many of us still use ccd(4) because
> Vinum did not meet our needs.
Alfred Perlsteing claims "Vinum comes from the universe where Spock
has a beard" (sorry, Gre
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:18:40PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> If you really want to play with RAIDframe I'd guess you'll have a much
> easier time of it under NetBSD, where it is included with the operating
> system. Getting it working under FreeBSD could be a lot of fun and you
> might
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:15:10PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason you can't use vinum(4)?
>
>Yes, sir, there is one, like I said before, I want to play with
>raidframe. Being a geek yourself you should understand that :-)
I un
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 01:15:10PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
Hi,
> Is there a reason you can't use vinum(4)?
Yes, sir, there is one, like I said before, I want to play with
raidframe. Being a geek yourself you should understand that :-)
Cheers,
--
Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>The latest raidframe patch seems to be a bit date now, I'd like to know
>if any of you has worked on getting it cleanly applying to a recent
>4.5-STABLE (4.6-RC indeed) system of even 5.0-CURRENT tree. I'd like to
>play with it and would like to know if
6 matches
Mail list logo
