Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
I would like to give some feedback. I listed the threads of proc 12
which
is intr,
# procstat -t 12
PIDTID COMM CPU PRI STATE WCHAN
12 13 intr 0 40 wait-
12 14 intr
Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:38:45PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all, (and FYI to hackers@ where I previousl sought feedback):
I've now committed procstat(1) to CVS. I've found it to be quite a
helpful debugging tool, am p
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
I would like to give some feedback. I listed the threads of proc 12 which
is intr,
# procstat -t 12
PIDTID COMM CPU PRI STATE WCHAN
12 13 intr 0 40 wait-
12 14 intr 0 52 w
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:10:27AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:38:45PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all, (and FYI to hackers@ where I previousl sought feedback):
>>>
>>> I've now committed procstat(1) to CVS.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:38:45PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all, (and FYI to hackers@ where I previousl sought feedback):
I've now committed procstat(1) to CVS. I've found it to be quite a helpful
debugging tool, am particularly pleased wi
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:38:45PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Dear all, (and FYI to hackers@ where I previousl sought feedback):
>
> I've now committed procstat(1) to CVS. I've found it to be quite a helpful
> debugging tool, am particularly pleased with -k/-kk, and would welcome
> feedback
6 matches
Mail list logo