On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, shyam burkule wrote:
hellow
can someone send me patch implementating page replacement algorithm in
freeBSD
Thanks
Shyam
No.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
Brian J. McGovern wrote:
All,
I've done some hacking on bootparamd to support multiple subnets
(along with applying some patches to allow some Sun-specific behavior) that
I'm using for jumpstarting Solaris/Sparc boxes across a boatload of small
subnets.
The most obvious change
It turns out that these patches almost apply in -current but while they
are enough to allow 4.x to work, they are not sufficient to allow
-current to work.
there is a bunch of different code in -current that is just not there in
4.x and Geom is sticking its finger in the picture as well.
I'd rather
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: If I get no complaints I'll commit these to 4.x.
: It's all different in 5.x so an MFC doesn't really work..
Is there any reason that you didn't just jump to int64_t for blocks
and such? You have a limit of
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 08:32:39AM -0700, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
>
> 1) linux_ipc.c has a pice of code commented that we can actually use now. I think
>the other pieces were added later and this didn't get changed. The patch is valid for
>RELENG_4 and HEAD. The current code will always r
Hello!
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
MK> I am going to take a look at your patches. Could you please fill a PR
MK> meantime?
Thank you very much. I've submitted the PR (bin/35843)
Hope to hear from you soon.
--
Oleg Sharoiko.
Software and Network Engineer
Computer Center of Rosto
Oleg,
On 11:28+0300, Mar 11, 2002, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The MD5 authentication of ripv2 packets calculated by routed is (for the
> moment) incompatible with MD5 authentication calculated by cisco and zebra
> routers. Routed skips two fields while running MD5_Update. Due to this rou
Stefan Esser wrote:
> On 2001-02-07 05:20 -0800, Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Follow-ups to the FreeBSD-Audit mail list only, please ... ]
> > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Wemm writes
:
> > > >So that fsck(8) can see what mode the FS *was* m
[ freebsd-stable removed from cc: list just cuz ]
> :> sysctl -w vm.debug_pageout_stats=1
> :> This output would be invaluable to me coming from people who still have
> :> major performance problems on heavily loaded machines.
> :
> :Okay, I'm gathering data as we speak, but, woul
:
:> I have made a patchset available for both -current and -stable on my site:
:> http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
:> sysctl -w vm.debug_pageout_stats=1
:> The debugging code prints a line to dmesg and /var/log/messages each
:> time the pageout daemon runs a scan
> I have made a patchset available for both -current and -stable on my site:
> http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
> sysctl -w vm.debug_pageout_stats=1
> The debugging code prints a line to dmesg and /var/log/messages each
> time the pageout daemon runs a scan, and te
> > Yes, it is this simple :-).
>
> Can you get it ready for 4.2? I'd like to see us be able to
> run bind9 in the next release.
Sure. I'll see if I can do it in the next couple of hours.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
* Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001113 22:17] wrote:
> > I was playing with bind9 and got the typical:
> >
> > On FreeBSD systems, the server logs error messages like "fcntl(8,
> > F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is due to
> > a bug in the FreeSBD /dev/random dev
Hi
I have something similar to this, and it goes slightly further.
Yes, it is this simple :-).
M
> I was playing with bind9 and got the typical:
>
> On FreeBSD systems, the server logs error messages like "fcntl(8,
> F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is due to
> a
Jim Mercer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 06:05:55PM -0500, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>
> > Just one question I always ask people trying to get things working at
> > full-duplex, is the card plugged into a hub at the other end?
>
> actually, we started with cross over cables, and then suspectin
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:29:15PM -0500, Jim Mercer wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 06:05:55PM -0500, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > > with the mailing list archives down, i can't do my own search, but i was
> > > hoping someone on these lists could give me some pointers.
> >
> > Try www.deja.com an
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 06:05:55PM -0500, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > with the mailing list archives down, i can't do my own search, but i was
> > hoping someone on these lists could give me some pointers.
>
> Try www.deja.com and search the muc.lists.freebsd.* hierarchy.
i'll poke about there.
>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 03:59:49PM -0500, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
> i hear that there are some patches which might fix some serious packet loss
> problems with the de driver in 100mbps fullduplex.
>
> i am running 3.4 (synced to stable via cvsup).
>
> with the mailing list archives down, i can't do
: Although with this crowd I'd probably have better luck with
: something like:
: "I have vmware running native on FreeBSD 3.2-release"...
If anyone's interested, I have some patches to make the vmmon driver compile
and load under 3.3, although it hangs the machine solid when vmware starts
us
19 matches
Mail list logo
