and
- what are the man differences between the old and new ways.
and it is starting to turn into a flame/bikeshed.
i just don't see what's wrong in SIMPLE procedure that just use existing C
compiler and just sys sources
Thanks for the information. I'll restore the documentation with
update
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:28:48AM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:38:58PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >
> > # make buildkernel ... KERNFAST=1
>
> Is it documented somewhere? I was using NO_CLEAN=1.
>
Yep, build(7).
--
Mateusz Guzik
_
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:38:58PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> # make buildkernel ... KERNFAST=1
Is it documented somewhere? I was using NO_CLEAN=1.
--
Jeremie Le Hen
Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
__
Julian writes:
> it is however a good way to get mismatching kernel and userland
> but that's not what we are discussing.
The method recommended on
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
"# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL"
is also a good way to get
On 11/22/12 1:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
"old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1)
On 23 November 2012 12:48, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>
>>For new/non-advanced users, this shouldn't necessarily be exposed
>> except as an implementation detail and a historical artifact; more
Lets kill this thread now.
I have the answers to
- should we keep the documentation
and
- what are th
For new/non-advanced users, this shouldn't necessarily be exposed
except as an implementation detail and a historical artifact; more
why?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsub
I do buy the argument that B is simpler than A, despite the fact that B
requires more commands than A. B can be thought-of as
simpler because I only have to memorize three things to get a kernel: (1) start
with a config file, (2) run config with said file
(3) follow the instructions that config
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
>
> Is there any value in keep
On Nov 22, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov 2012 18:56, "Wojciech Puchar"
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> How is it simpler?
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > strange question i thought it is obviously clear.
> >
> > $EDITOR config
> > config
> > cd ../compile/
> > make depend
> >
I was only confused because you had asserted that six commands was
simpler-- Now you point out that you don't keep a src tree, paired with
freebsd-update it is be a good combination for custom kernels :)
Thank you for clarifying.
this is not a discussion.
__
On 22 Nov 2012 18:56, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>
>>
>> How is it simpler?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
> strange question i thought it is obviously clear.
>
> $EDITOR config
> config
> cd ../compile/
> make depend
> make
> make install
>
>
> that's all. and no need to keep whole /usr/src, just sys
>
> w
How is it simpler?
Chris
strange question i thought it is obviously clear.
$EDITOR config
config
cd ../compile/
make depend
make
make install
that's all. and no need to keep whole /usr/src, just sys
what is wrong in it?
___
freebsd-hackers@fre
On 22 Nov 2012 16:26, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Value: ability to embed entire config (comments and all) into the kernel
>
>
> value 2: simplicity.
>
How is it simpler?
Chris
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:35:57AM -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> > While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> > "old style" kernel configu
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
>
> Is there any value in keep
Value: ability to embed entire config (comments and all) into the kernel
value 2: simplicity.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-un
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
"old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
Is there any value in keeping this document
On 21 November 2012 23:52, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/21/12 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
>> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
>> "old style" kernel configuration involving running conf
On 11/21/12 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
"old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
Is there any value in keeping this documented
On 11/21/2012 8:21 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
>> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
>> "old style" kernel configuration involving running co
On Nov 21, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
>
I always build kernels with c
22 matches
Mail list logo
