Re: non reliable nmi

2003-09-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Sep-2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/04/03 >at 09:12 AM, Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>I haven't kept quite up to date on my x86 hardware lately (read: in the >>past five to ten years), but I distinctly remember a time when everyone >>referre

Re: non reliable nmi

2003-09-04 Thread cjarvis
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/04/03 at 09:12 AM, Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I haven't kept quite up to date on my x86 hardware lately (read: in the >past five to ten years), but I distinctly remember a time when everyone >referred to x86's NMI as a joke: a non-maskable interrupt

Re: non reliable nmi

2003-09-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:16:23AM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: > > From: Mike Silbersack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Don Bowman wrote: > > > > > I have machdep.ddb_on_nmi=1. > > > I can drop into the debugger with the magic > > > key sequence. However, when i hit the NMI > > >

RE: non reliable nmi

2003-09-04 Thread Don Bowman
> From: Mike Silbersack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Don Bowman wrote: > > > I have machdep.ddb_on_nmi=1. > > I can drop into the debugger with the magic > > key sequence. However, when i hit the NMI > > jumper, i don't always go there. Sometimes > > I do. > > The system is 4-w

Re: non reliable nmi

2003-09-03 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Don Bowman wrote: > I have machdep.ddb_on_nmi=1. > I can drop into the debugger with the magic > key sequence. However, when i hit the NMI > jumper, i don't always go there. Sometimes > I do. > The system is 4-way SMP [2xHTT xeon processors] > with 4.7. > > Any suggestion on