Re: ipfw fwd to named

2002-04-16 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:53:01PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > I have network interface rl0 > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.10.22 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255 > inet 192.168.10.26 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.10.26 > ether

Re: ipfw fwd to named (fwd)

2002-04-16 Thread apache
> >do you have a loopback route at the host environment like: > >192.168.10.26 127.0.0.1 UGHS3 4497lo0 > > sorry,... wrong ip... i meant the ip of the jailed host 192.168.10.22 > should go to the loopback. 192.168.10.26 is a jailed ip. But anyway its alias.

Re: ipfw fwd to named

2002-04-16 Thread apache
> do you have a loopback route at the host environment like: > 192.168.10.26 127.0.0.1 UGHS3 4497lo0 > > at my side that was the problem (and this route is never mentioned at the > jail-man page...( ) it didn't help. As i've told, i can ``dig -p 2053 ...'',

Re: ipfw fwd to named (fwd)

2002-04-15 Thread Ingo Flaschberger
> I'm not sure the the forwarding code works for udp.. > (In fact I'm pretty sure it is not fully implemented) > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I have network interface rl0 > > > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 192.168.10.22 netmask 0xff00 broad

Re: ipfw fwd to named

2002-04-15 Thread Ingo Flaschberger
Hi On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > I'm not sure the the forwarding code works for udp.. > (In fact I'm pretty sure it is not fully implemented) > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I have network interface rl0 > > > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > >

Re: ipfw fwd to named

2002-04-15 Thread Julian Elischer
I'm not sure the the forwarding code works for udp.. (In fact I'm pretty sure it is not fully implemented) On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > I have network interface rl0 > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.10.22 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255