Re: improved unifdef(1)

2002-05-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 04:58:32PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > If anyone is interested I'd appreciate some testing, and it > > would be nice to get it committed eventually. > > Ooooh! :-) > Yes please! > I'll look at this. Please restore the CSRG ID's and Copyright along with other changes we

Re: improved unifdef(1)

2002-04-26 Thread Tony Finch
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:22:50PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > > It's available from . There's now a manual page too, . Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: NORTHWESTERLY BACKING SOUTHWESTERLY

Re: improved unifdef(1)

2002-04-26 Thread Mark Murray
> The unifdef in the system is not suited to heavyweight tasks like > (say) xterm's main.c or wu-ftpd for a number of reasons: > > * it has a very low limit on the number of command-line arguments >that it can cope with (100) -- I've sumbitted PR#37454 about this. > > * it doesn't have the