On 3 September 2012 12:09, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 3 September 2012 12:01, wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 3 September 2012 10:19, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn
On 3 September 2012 12:01, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 3 September 2012 10:19, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn clone" ? AFAIK that isn't
broken.
>>>
>>> Well,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 3 September 2012 10:19, Ryan Stone wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn clone" ? AFAIK that isn't
>>> broken.
>>
>> Well, let's put it this way: I started a git svn
On 3 September 2012 11:12, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> I've done the same and it only took me a few hours although the ports
>> repo took a few days.
>
> Hm. Maybe you were working from a local, svnsync'ed repo?
nope: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org - it
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I've done the same and it only took me a few hours although the ports
> repo took a few days.
Hm. Maybe you were working from a local, svnsync'ed repo?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On 3 September 2012 10:19, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn clone" ? AFAIK that isn't
>> broken.
>
> Well, let's put it this way: I started a git svn clone of the src
> repository on Aug 28. It's still going.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Why isn't git.freebsd.org a straight "git svn clone" ? AFAIK that isn't
> broken.
Well, let's put it this way: I started a git svn clone of the src
repository on Aug 28. It's still going. And I'm only creating a very
small subset of the bran
On 2 September 2012 15:40, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:40:24 -0700, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> >> I've just noticed that freebsd commits on github come with a
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:40:24 -0700, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> >> I've just noticed that freebsd commits on github come with a git note.
> >> If you look past the diff of the commit,
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> I've just noticed that freebsd commits on github come with a git note.
>> If you look past the diff of the commit, you will see a note that
>> contains path and revision number.
>>
>>
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> I've just noticed that freebsd commits on github come with a git note.
> If you look past the diff of the commit, you will see a note that
> contains path and revision number.
>
> For example:
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/fa32f
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> More generally tho, I'm curious how one is supposed to use the
>>> seemingly more official repositories without this bit of data; I'd
>>> expect I must be missing some critical clue.
I've just noticed that freebsd commits on github come
On 9/1/2012 7:04 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Hagerty wrote:
>> > I use git://gitorious.org/freebsd/freebsd.git which has
>> > stable/releng/release branches and which does include git-svn-id
>>
>> This is what I'm using now, in fact. It lacks the 9.1 r
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Hagerty wrote:
> > I use git://gitorious.org/freebsd/freebsd.git which has
> > stable/releng/release branches and which does include git-svn-id
>
> This is what I'm using now, in fact. It lacks the 9.1 releng
> branch tho; I don't know if this is a bug
> I use git://gitorious.org/freebsd/freebsd.git which has
> stable/releng/release branches and which does include git-svn-id
This is what I'm using now, in fact. It lacks the 9.1 releng
branch tho; I don't know if this is a bug or feature.
More generally tho, I'm curious how one is sup
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Daniel Hagerty wrote:
> How does one map between svn commit IDs and git IDs with this
> repository? Most git-svn repositories include a git-svn-id: header at
> the end of commit messages, but this repository doesn't. The
> freebsd-head repository at git:
16 matches
Mail list logo