Re: etherchannel

2000-10-13 Thread rbg
How does this compare with Intel's Adaptive Load Balancing (ALB) ? -- I guess it's closer to Intel's Link Aggregation ?? Robert.. _ Robert Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP Performance, Inc Austin, Tex

Re: etherchannel

2000-10-12 Thread Archie Cobbs
Lyndon Nerenberg writes: > Mike> This is primarily conditional on Cisco or some other party > Mike> making the specifications for etherchannel freely available. > Mike> The last time I went looking for any actual documentation on > Mike> how to format things on the wire, I drew a c

Re: etherchannel

2000-10-12 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> "rbg" == rbg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: rbg> How does this compare with Intel's Adaptive Load Balancing rbg> (ALB) ? -- I guess it's closer to Intel's Link Aggregation Dunno, I'm not familiar with ALB. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha

Re: etherchannel

2000-10-12 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> "Mike" == Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> This is primarily conditional on Cisco or some other party Mike> making the specifications for etherchannel freely available. Mike> The last time I went looking for any actual documentation on Mike> how to format things

Re: etherchannel

2000-10-12 Thread Mike Smith
This is primarily conditional on Cisco or some other party making the specifications for etherchannel freely available. The last time I went looking for any actual documentation on how to format things on the wire, I drew a complete blank. Then we just need someone to lend a developer the req

Re: etherchannel / bonding

2000-10-12 Thread Dennis
> >It's used for other cases where a high capacity circuit is built out >of multiple physical channels. That's what the original claims about >EtherChannel were from cisco, and it's what we use it for. That it >continues to work if one the links has a failure is a bonus. It's a >substantial bo

Re: etherchannel / bonding

2000-10-12 Thread David Scheidt
On Wed, 12 Oct 1988, Dennis wrote: :At 09:01 AM 10/12/2000, David Scheidt wrote: :>On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dennis wrote: :> :>:We will have the feature in our bandwidth manager product for FreeBSD :>:shortly, including fallover. Its really load balancing; bonding is a bad :>:term (no doubt coined by

Re: etherchannel / bonding

2000-10-12 Thread Wes Peters
Dennis wrote: > > At 09:01 AM 10/12/2000, David Scheidt wrote: > >On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dennis wrote: > > > >:We will have the feature in our bandwidth manager product for FreeBSD > >:shortly, including fallover. Its really load balancing; bonding is a bad > >:term (no doubt coined by the linux ca

Re: etherchannel / bonding

2000-10-12 Thread Dennis
At 09:01 AM 10/12/2000, David Scheidt wrote: >On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dennis wrote: > >:We will have the feature in our bandwidth manager product for FreeBSD >:shortly, including fallover. Its really load balancing; bonding is a bad >:term (no doubt coined by the linux camp). >: > >It's telco usage f

Re: etherchannel / bonding

2000-10-12 Thread David Scheidt
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dennis wrote: :We will have the feature in our bandwidth manager product for FreeBSD :shortly, including fallover. Its really load balancing; bonding is a bad :term (no doubt coined by the linux camp). : It's telco usage from before there was a linux (and probably before t

Re: etherchannel / bonding

2000-10-11 Thread Dennis
At 04:25 AM 10/09/2000, Andreas Brodmann wrote: >Hello all, > >does anyone know if the etherchannel >(aka bonding) is a feature that's expected >to be seen in future releases of freebsd? > >Andreas We will have the feature in our bandwidth manager product for FreeBSD shortly, including fallover.