Peter Jeremy writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > 9413 what? Puppies?
> Ooops, sorry - KB/sec as reported in the dump summary.
Thank you :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On 2010-Oct-27 20:17:06 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>Peter Jeremy writes:
>> I've mostly convered to ZFS but still have UFS root (which is basically
>> a full base install without /var but including /usr/src - 94k inodes
>> and 1.7GB). I've run both the 8-stable ("stable") and patched ("jf
Peter Jeremy writes:
> I've mostly convered to ZFS but still have UFS root (which is basically
> a full base install without /var but including /usr/src - 94k inodes
> and 1.7GB). I've run both the 8-stable ("stable") and patched ("jfd") dump
> alternately 4 times with 50/250MB cache with the fo
On 2010-Oct-24 18:05:05 +0200, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote:
>It appears that modifying dump to use a shared cache in a very simple way
>(move the control structures to the shared segment and perform simple locking)
>yields substantial speed increases.
Indeed. That's better than I expected.
>Woul
4 matches
Mail list logo
