Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
> > > Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. > > > > No. > > Perhaps I'm missing something. I know that the messages I get via nfs_msg > in nfs_socket.c I haven't been seeing in my syslogs, and when they show up > in the dmesg output they are not timestamped. >

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Mike Smith
> > > Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. > > > > No. > > Perhaps I'm missing something. I know that the messages I get via nfs_msg > in nfs_socket.c I haven't been seeing in my syslogs, and when they show up > in the dmesg output they are not timestamped. >

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
I just checked - I have kern.debug in my syslog.conf, so it's clear that these messages are either not being logged via syslog (either that or I have been missing them in my logs - possible, but I doubt it). H To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
> > Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. > > No. Perhaps I'm missing something. I know that the messages I get via nfs_msg in nfs_socket.c I haven't been seeing in my syslogs, and when they show up in the dmesg output they are not timestamped. Somebody was co

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
I just checked - I have kern.debug in my syslog.conf, so it's clear that these messages are either not being logged via syslog (either that or I have been missing them in my logs - possible, but I doubt it). H To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacker

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
> > Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. > > No. Perhaps I'm missing something. I know that the messages I get via nfs_msg in nfs_socket.c I haven't been seeing in my syslogs, and when they show up in the dmesg output they are not timestamped. Somebody was com

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
> > Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. > > No. I should have been clearer here; anything that writes to the kernel message buffer is also passed to syslog. > > The primary intention here is to have the messages that are in the dmesg > > output have timestamp

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Mike Smith
> > Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. > > No. I should have been clearer here; anything that writes to the kernel message buffer is also passed to syslog. > > The primary intention here is to have the messages that are in the dmesg > > output have timestamps

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
> Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. No. > The primary intention here is to have the messages that are in the dmesg > output have timestamps. No. > And I have had crashes/panics where the syslog information just didn't get > out in time (but I might be mist

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Mike Smith
> Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. No. > The primary intention here is to have the messages that are in the dmesg > output have timestamps. No. > And I have had crashes/panics where the syslog information just didn't get > out in time (but I might be mista

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. The primary intention here is to have the messages that are in the dmesg output have timestamps. And I have had crashes/panics where the syslog information just didn't get out in time (but I might be mistaken on this one).

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
Apparently there are places that log via dmesg instead of via syslog. The primary intention here is to have the messages that are in the dmesg output have timestamps. And I have had crashes/panics where the syslog information just didn't get out in time (but I might be mistaken on this one). H

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Anonymous
> If syslogd is up and running (and the data gets stored before the system > dies) there is a good chance that syslogd will timestamp the messages. I don't think this would be a good idea. Syslogd does a fine job of adding timestamps; there aren't any really relevant cases in which having tim

Re: dmesg date/timestamps

1999-06-21 Thread Mike Smith
> If syslogd is up and running (and the data gets stored before the system > dies) there is a good chance that syslogd will timestamp the messages. I don't think this would be a good idea. Syslogd does a fine job of adding timestamps; there aren't any really relevant cases in which having time