>Can nohup really prevent processes from trapping SIGHUP? I thought it
>just set the SIGUP handler to discard and hoped for the best.
It's normally a bug to catch ignored signals. Daomons that reread config
files when they receive a signal may be counterexamples. OTOH, they
probably shouldn't be
The point was who the heck sends the SIGHUP and why ?
Poul-Henning
In message <23428.932574...@axl.noc.iafrica.com>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>
>[Hi-jacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
>
>On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 18:15:09 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> There is another one you may want to look
[Hi-jacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 18:15:09 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> There is another one you may want to look at, I have not figured it
> out yet:
>
> I try to start a ntpd from /etc/rc.local this way:
>
> nohup /usr/local/bin/ntpd -d -d > /usr/ntp/
>Can nohup really prevent processes from trapping SIGHUP? I thought it
>just set the SIGUP handler to discard and hoped for the best.
It's normally a bug to catch ignored signals. Daomons that reread config
files when they receive a signal may be counterexamples. OTOH, they
probably shouldn't b
The point was who the heck sends the SIGHUP and why ?
Poul-Henning
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>
>[Hi-jacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
>
>On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 18:15:09 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> There is another one you may want to look at, I have not f
[Hi-jacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 18:15:09 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> There is another one you may want to look at, I have not figured it
> out yet:
>
> I try to start a ntpd from /etc/rc.local this way:
>
> nohup /usr/local/bin/ntpd -d -d > /usr/ntp
6 matches
Mail list logo
