> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > If you insist on writing a patch, then please make it
> > default off.
>
> rink@ just provided one, and it does default to off. I fully agree with
> defaulting it to off as well; those of us that want it on can set it as
> such
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:46:31AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'll try out said patch this weekend. Assuming it works, and does get
> committed, I'll be more than happy to submit a PR along with a patch to
> update the loader.8 manpage, documenting kern.ignore_old_msgbuf.
Sounds good to me.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> If you insist on writing a patch, then please make it
> default off.
rink@ just provided one, and it does default to off. I fully agree with
defaulting it to off as well; those of us that want it on can set it as
such in loader.conf
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > [...]
> Either way, it's a feature with major security implications. So, for
> those of us who are concerned about master.passwd changes via
> mergemaster being stuffed into msgbuf, how do we disable said feature?
> (Before answering, see bel
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:09:24AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Maybe I should look into writing a patch that does in fact clear the
> buffer immediately before reboot, and tie it to a sysctl.
I suggest just making a loader tunable to do this. I think the following
should do it (untested):
---
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:52:54AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Upon a reboot, the kernel is usually loaded to the same
> > > physical addresses in RAM where it was before, so the
> > > dmesg buffer will be at the same location, too (unless
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Upon a reboot, the kernel is usually loaded to the same
> > physical addresses in RAM where it was before, so the
> > dmesg buffer will be at the same location, too (unless
> > you built a new kernel, of course). So all the contents
> > from
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:28:35AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> > I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
> > taken to administer.
> > What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel
> buffer
> > that is taken rig
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
> taken to administer.
> What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel buffer
> that is taken right after file system(s) are mounted.
> Lately i have found that one router
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
> taken to administer.
> What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel buffer
> that is taken right after file system(s) are m
I also fixed a bug that didnt let it run in cron, because I wasnt using
full paths (doh!)...so it should work fine from cron now
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 00:34 -0500, Timour Ezeev wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
>
> > I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
> > htt
Thanks! Merged into release.
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 00:34 -0500, Timour Ezeev wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
>
> > I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
> > http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
> >
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
-Julio
I think you have a small problem with cvs release entry, i.e. when you
run your program you get
*default release=cvs tag==cvs tag=.
instead o
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
-Julio
I think you have a small problem with cvs release entry, i.e. when you
run your program you get
*default release=cvs tag==cvs tag=.
instead o
I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
-Julio
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 03:52 -0400, Leonardo Alfonzo Díaz Gamboa wrote:
> I can't see the attachment you mentioned in your e-mail. (inlined)
>
> - Original Message -
> From
Ben Smithurst wrote:
>
> Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> > I looks to me like Julian's machine has the configuration problem.
> > The dhcp client cannot get enough bpf's.
>
> So why did tcpdump work? Both dhclient and tcpdump need one bpf, no? I
> initially thought the same as you but then ask
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> I looks to me like Julian's machine has the configuration problem.
> The dhcp client cannot get enough bpf's.
So why did tcpdump work? Both dhclient and tcpdump need one bpf, no? I
initially thought the same as you but then asked myself that question.
--
Ben Smit
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>
> On Wednesday, 14 June 2000 at 1:00:27 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > So, if you are in the Singapore Changi international airport,
> > the internet center in the transit area will
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Wednesday, 14 June 2000 at 1:00:27 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> So, if you are in the Singapore Changi international airport,
> the internet center in the transit area will loan you for FREE,
> a wavelan PC-CARD.
>
> So
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Matthew Reimer wrote:
> The Netgear FS105 five-port 100BaseTX switch is $84.95 at buy.com
> (http://www.buy.com/comp/product.asp?SKU=10221960), though they are
> back-ordered.
And I hate to reply twice, but the switch I bought (EZXS55W) is listed at
$76.95. Hmm. :)
- alex
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Matthew Reimer wrote:
> The Netgear FS105 five-port 100BaseTX switch is $84.95 at buy.com
> (http://www.buy.com/comp/product.asp?SKU=10221960), though they are
> back-ordered.
Sure, but these were in stock. :^)
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
The Netgear FS105 five-port 100BaseTX switch is $84.95 at buy.com
(http://www.buy.com/comp/product.asp?SKU=10221960), though they are
back-ordered.
Matt
Alex Zepeda wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > I have a good reason to revive this thread. I thought anyone who followe
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> I have a good reason to revive this thread. I thought anyone who followed
> this conversation might want to know that one of the switches we dicussed,
> the Netgear FS-105, is on a special at CompUSA right now -- THROUGH TOMORROW.
> The special is a $20 m
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> BTW, Kudos to the KAME folk, the ipv6 and ipsec stuff looks like it's
> going to turn into a winner! IPSEC is going to be one really good reason
> for needing ever-faster cpu's :-).
Maybe Intel should have been approached for financial as
:We attacked Rich's switch in the lab. We plugged ports 1-4 into 4 10/100
:ports on a SmartBits 2000 test chassis and banged it with full-duplex bi-
:directional streams between ports 1<->2 and 3<->4. I am happy to report
:that it passed 100% of traffic at all packet sizes except 64 bytes, whe
Pete Mckenna wrote:
>
> Wes,
> Have you managed to test the switch and if so how did it do ? I have a
> FS-108 on order.
Yes. I bought two FS-105's, one for me and one for a co-worker. CompUSA
had a $20 rebate on them from 12/26 - 1/1, making them $99.
We attacked Rich's switch in the lab. W
Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> I don't think that you realy need a switch to achieve
> this speed on an empty network. With two machines
> connected to a 3Com 24-port 100Mbps hub (simplex)
> I had no problems achieving ~8MB/s on one FTP transfer
> and over 4MB/s on each of two FTP transfers running
> i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've got one currently and my FreeBSD box can do 3000-3300kBytes a second
> without any complaints..
>
> Full duplex has it's advantages, no doubt
I don't think that you realy need a switch to achieve
this speed on an empty network. With two machines
connected to a
I've got one currently and my FreeBSD box can do 3000-3300kBytes a second
without any complaints..
Full duplex has it's advantages, no doubt
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > get r
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> when running saturation tests and never able to figure out what
> was causing it.
I have a good reason to revive thi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Louis A. Mamakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
>(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
[...]
>In a "what the hell" move, I powered up the ethernet Netgear Ethernet switch
>with it's
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:45 AM -0700 12/21/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> >Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > > [...] but I was wondering how much one has to fork out before you
> > > get extra options like a port-mirroring capability...
> >
> >Lots more, in terms of dollars. For this, you need at
At 12:45 AM -0700 12/21/99, Wes Peters wrote:
>Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > [...] but I was wondering how much one has to fork out before you
> > get extra options like a port-mirroring capability...
>
>Lots more, in terms of dollars. For this, you need at least a managed
>switch, and probably a
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:46:37PM -0600, Tim Tsai wrote:
> >
> > Best bang for the buck category: HP ProCurve 4000M. 40 switched 10/100
> > ports (that's with the chassis half filled).
>
> Note that HP's pricing on additional cards is silly.
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:46:37PM -0600, Tim Tsai wrote:
>
> Best bang for the buck category: HP ProCurve 4000M. 40 switched 10/100
> ports (that's with the chassis half filled).
Note that HP's pricing on additional cards is silly. It's cheaper
to buy 2 4000Ms and throw the second chassi
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> > At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> > >Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > > > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal wit
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Tim Tsai wrote:
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> >Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> > > when running saturation tests
On the topic of switches...
Does anyone have experience (good or bad) with the CNet
CNSH-1601 or CNSH-2401? Those are unmanaged 19" switches
(10/100) with 16 and 24 ports, respectively, and a
100BaseFX (fibre) uplink port. And they're suspiciously
cheap over here [1].
We might get one of those
> something like this (which is fine...), but I was wondering how
> much one has to fork out before you get extra options like a
> port-mirroring capability...
You usually find this capability on managed switches (fairly obvious,
since you need a management interface to configure port mirroring
At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
>Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> > when running saturation tests and never able to figure out what
> >
:Yes. The nice thing about modern swithcing power supplies are that if
:you DO hear any vibration, you know you have big problems and are
:courting disaster. At least that's my experience in homebrewing a 12V
:-> 16V converter for my Sony VAIO 505TS. The original magnetics I
:chose easily over
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes:
: :or higher, which makes things a whole lot easier. No 60Hz humm, no
: :vibration - hell, you can even run the frequency up past 100 MHz and
:
: Needless to say I
:or higher, which makes things a whole lot easier. No 60Hz humm, no
:vibration - hell, you can even run the frequency up past 100 MHz and
Needless to say I meant 100 KHz here, not 100 MHz.
:> :"everyone" here).
:>
:> This is not true at all.
:
:Oh, and how many products have you passed through FCC/EC/Japanese environmental
:certification? None, apparently.
Four in the last 15 years. I've been involved with in-home electronic
management systems and believe me, all t
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> I really hate these switching regulated DC wall plugs. They always use
> :> cheap caps in them to save money and then don't bother adding any
> :> protection to the motherboard. I prefer AC wall plugs or unregulated DC
> :> wall plugs and then a smal
:> I really hate these switching regulated DC wall plugs. They always use
:> cheap caps in them to save money and then don't bother adding any
:> protection to the motherboard. I prefer AC wall plugs or unregulated DC
:> wall plugs and then a small switching regulator on the mot
:> Heh heh. Indeed, they are LNE100TX V2.0 cards.
:>
:> I'll try adding 'dc' in. If it works, can I add a comment about
:> 'LNE100TX' cards to the comments in LINT for 'dc'?
:
:Sure, if you like, however note that "man 4 dc" should also yield a
:list of supported cards, including t
> "Matthew" == Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> :At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100
Matthew> switched :hub. It works fine except that it hangs
Matthew> occasionally (can be :reset by power-cycling). So we
Matthew> don't buy them any more.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :with a *really* big heatsink attached -this is the "bridge on chip". And
> :I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
> :(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
> :
> :It was than than I make the connection - Hmm.. SGI LCD moni
:>
:> I'll try adding 'dc' in. If it works, can I add a comment about
:> 'LNE100TX' cards to the comments in LINT for 'dc'?
:
:Sure, if you like, however note that "man 4 dc" should also yield a
:list of supported cards, including the LNE100TX v2.0.
:
:-Bill
Yup, but that assumes y
:with a *really* big heatsink attached -this is the "bridge on chip". And
:I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
:(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
:
:It was than than I make the connection - Hmm.. SGI LCD monitor don't work.
:Ethernet switch
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Matthew Dillon
had to walk into mine and say:
> :Uhm uhm uhm. You do *not* want to say things like that within earshot
> :of me. Describe the cards better. Describe how you came to the
> :conclusion that they aren't supported. What chip
:I have a D-Link DSH-5 5-port 10/100 dualspeed hub here at home,
:and I'm reasonably happy with it. It certainly doesn't hang. One
:of the machines here has trouble negotiating a working 100Mbit/s
:link, but that's just as likely a problem of the Linux tulip driver.
:...
:Christian "naddy" Weisge
:Uhm uhm uhm. You do *not* want to say things like that within earshot
:of me. Describe the cards better. Describe how you came to the
:conclusion that they aren't supported. What chip is on them? If it's
:the LC82C115 then these are the LNE100TX Version 2.0 with Wake On LAN,
:and they *are* supp
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Matthew Dillon
had to walk into mine and say:
> :At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
> :hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> :reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Al
Tim Tsai wrote:
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply they generally hold up
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
> hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Also
> at my pre-previous employer we had small 8-port 10Mpbs hubs
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> I picked up a nifty little D-Link DSS-5+ 5-port 10/100 switch today
> CompUSA had a 5-port network kit labeled 'DFE-910' which had the
> DSS-5+ and two DFE-530TX+ NIC Cards ('rl' driver), plus cables, for $130.
Warehouse.com sells the Netgear FS105 for $99.9
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply they generally hold up a lot better.
>
> hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> reset by power-cycling).
Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
power supply they generally hold up a lot better.
I have a N
:At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
:hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
:reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Also
:at my pre-previous employer we had small 8-port 10Mpbs hubs from
:D-Link and they had the same problem, s
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> I picked up a nifty little D-Link DSS-5+ 5-port 10/100 switch today
> CompUSA had a 5-port network kit labeled 'DFE-910' which had the
> DSS-5+ and two DFE-530TX+ NIC Cards ('rl' driver), plus cables, for $130.
>
> It appears to operate quite nicely. I
63 matches
Mail list logo
