On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:12:02AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
> >In a message written on Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:47:57PM -0600, Brandon D.
> >Valentine wrote:
> >
> >>I'm afraid there's not much that FreeBSD can do about this. All PRs are
> >>forwarded to the public freebsd-
Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:47:57PM -0600, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
I'm afraid there's not much that FreeBSD can do about this. All PRs are
forwarded to the public freebsd-bugs mailing list ...
There's no reason the sender address needs to go to the mail
In a message written on Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 04:38:54PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav
wrote:
> No, you need to realize that spam will happen no matter how careful
> you are, and take appropriate countermeasures.
Wearing a seatbelt and defensive driving are not mutually exclusive.
--
Leo Bic
Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is, the sender address could be stored in the PR database,
> visable only to those who can change the status of a PR (I assume
> they have some password protected web/e-mail interface).
The PR database is distributed worldwide through cvsup.
> While
In a message written on Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:47:57PM -0600, Brandon D. Valentine
wrote:
> I'm afraid there's not much that FreeBSD can do about this. All PRs are
> forwarded to the public freebsd-bugs mailing list and on any public
> mailing list there are inevitably n > 1 Microsoft clients su
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:58:20PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
>
> I don't think there need be any more doubt that PRs are being
> forwarded to virus-infected clients.
I'm afraid there's not much that FreeBSD can do about this. All PRs are
forwarded to the public freebsd-bugs mailing list an
6 matches
Mail list logo
