Re: Y2K: groff in the tree out of date

2000-02-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Ted Faber wrote: > >> The groff in 3.4-stable is out of date. > > > >Be sure to catch 4.0-RELEASE. :-) > > I was planning on it. Just so I understand, 3.x will not have it's > groff updated? I think it would be premature to say that. Your best bet is to ask the person who

Re: Y2K: groff in the tree out of date

2000-02-16 Thread Ted Faber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > >On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:29:19 PST, Ted Faber wrote: > >> The groff in 3.4-stable is out of date. > >Be sure to catch 4.0-RELEASE. :-) I was planning on it. Just so I understand, 3.

Re: Y2K: groff in the tree out of date

2000-02-16 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:29:19 PST, Ted Faber wrote: > The groff in 3.4-stable is out of date. Be sure to catch 4.0-RELEASE. :-) > Should I submit a PR on this? You'd probably be wasting your time, given that a Merge From Current is unlikely for something like this. Unless there are critical