Re: Winbond Watchdog

2010-08-23 Thread perryh
"Daniel O'Connor" wrote: > On 23/08/2010, at 1:24, Xin LI wrote: > > 2010/8/7 Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav : > >> Xin LI writes: > >>> I'm still polishing up the driver, there seems to be no way to > >>> figure out the base port address directly (datasheet said it's > >>> either 0x2e and 0x4e) so for now

Re: Winbond Watchdog

2010-08-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
"Daniel O'Connor" writes: > They're LPC ISA devices, I don't know if they appear in any PNP or > ACPI tables though. Same issue with ichwd: ISTR there is actually supposed to be an entry for it in an ACPI table, but on the motherboard I had when I tested it before I committed it, that table eithe

Re: Winbond Watchdog

2010-08-22 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 23/08/2010, at 1:24, Xin LI wrote: > 2010/8/7 Dag-Erling Smørgrav : >> Xin LI writes: >>> I'm still polishing up the driver, there seems to be no way to figure >>> out the base port address directly (datasheet said it's either 0x2e and >>> 0x4e) so for now I have its device identify method to

Re: Winbond Watchdog

2010-08-22 Thread Xin LI
2010/8/7 Dag-Erling Smørgrav : > Xin LI writes: >> I'm still polishing up the driver, there seems to be no way to figure >> out the base port address directly (datasheet said it's either 0x2e and >> 0x4e) so for now I have its device identify method to do some dirty >> hacks (outb/inb directly) an

Re: Winbond Watchdog [Was Re: Supermicro BIOS's watchdog feature?]

2010-08-18 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 07/08/2010 20:39 Bjoern A. Zeeb said the following: > There are not many assertions put in place and it only checks one of > the two base ports as I had only done it for me so far. Unfortunately > there is no ACPI WDRT entry here (either?). devinfo -r was to some use > though. ACPI WDRT seems

Re: Winbond Watchdog [Was Re: Supermicro BIOS's watchdog feature?]

2010-08-07 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Xin LI wrote: Hey, a bit unrealted but I faced some of those problems lately as well. On 2010/07/01 00:12, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Xin LI writes: "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" writes: Perhaps the motherboard has additional watchdog hardware? If you disable the watchdog in

Re: Winbond Watchdog

2010-08-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Xin LI writes: > I'm still polishing up the driver, there seems to be no way to figure > out the base port address directly (datasheet said it's either 0x2e and > 0x4e) so for now I have its device identify method to do some dirty > hacks (outb/inb directly) and only check if with appropriate key