Walter C. Pelissero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> started this thread with
message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
it was noted that
bios_string(0xf9000, 0xf9000, "PC Engines WRAP.1C "
was indeed not working correctly on WRAP.1E platforms. I had been
working on this problem recently and have just submitted a p
Le Vendredi 20 mai 2005 à 12:52 -0400, Larry Baird a écrit :
> Walter,
>
> > Are you sure about that?
> Yes and no. I am sure that I have working code. I just realized that
> when I ported my patch to 5.4 I missed one thing. The following patch
> should work muxh better for you. (-:
No
Walter,
> Are you sure about that?
Yes and no. I am sure that I have working code. I just realized that
when I ported my patch to 5.4 I missed one thing. The following patch
should work muxh better for you. (-:
Larry
--- geode.c.origFri May 20 09:41:06 2005
+++ geode.c Fri May 20
Larry Baird writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Reading geode.c it appears (at least to me) that the led devices are
> > created for the WRAP.1C but not for the WRAP.1E.
> >
> > Reading the PC-Engines documentation it looks to me as WRAP.1C and
> > WRAP1.E were identical
Larry Baird writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Reading geode.c it appears (at least to me) that the led devices are
> > created for the WRAP.1C but not for the WRAP.1E.
> >
> > Reading the PC-Engines documentation it looks to me as WRAP.1C and
> > WRAP1.E were identical
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Reading geode.c it appears (at least to me) that the led devices are
> created for the WRAP.1C but not for the WRAP.1E.
>
> Reading the PC-Engines documentation it looks to me as WRAP.1C and
> WRAP1.E were identical when it comes to the LEDs, thus it wou
you'll have to fiddel with src/sys/i386/i386/geode.c
look for
bios_string(0xf9000, 0xf9000, "PC Engines WRAP.1C "
and you will see why.
this patch should work:
--- 5.3/src/sys/i386/i386/geode.c Sun Nov 21 16:01:04 2004
+++ 5.4/src/sys/i386/i386/geode.c Wed Jun 16 12:47:07 2004
7 matches
Mail list logo