Ian,
Ian Cartwright wrote:
>
> As I understand it, so long as the local tunnel endpoint is the external
> interface of the local gateway, the encapsulated traffic should already
> look like it is coming from the external interface and should not be
> NATed (while the traffic inside the tunnel lo
To: Ian Cartwright
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VPN Routing through gif (4) tunnel
Ian,
this stuff is definitly tricky to get into... :-)
Ian Cartwright wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the document, it was very informative. So what
> you are sayng is that I am running two t
Ian,
this stuff is definitly tricky to get into... :-)
Ian Cartwright wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the document, it was very informative. So what
> you are sayng is that I am running two tunnels in parallel? I had
> suspected this, but since it was the only way I was able to make it work
at do you think? Am I understanding this correctly?
Thanks!
Ian Cartwright
-Original Message-
From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Ian Cartwright
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VPN Routing through gif (4) tunnel
Hi,
Ian Cartwright
Hi,
Ian Cartwright wrote:
> I am trying to construct a "B2B" mode VPN tunnel between my house and my
> work using FreeBSD.
...
> Here is my current configuration (IPs changed to protect the guilty):
>
> fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet 100.100.100.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 68.3.250.
Ian Cartwright wrote:
> I am trying to construct a "B2B" mode VPN tunnel between my house and my
> work using FreeBSD. My work uses Checkpoint VPN-1 and I have a FreeBSD
> firewall that is running ipfilter to do firewall/NAT duties. I have so
> far been successful in creating a tunnel between the
6 matches
Mail list logo
