Re: The poor man's cryptfs

2002-09-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel O'Connor" writes: >On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 14:18, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >Have you seen ports/security/vncrypt? >> >> Or src/sys/geom/geom_aes ? > >Whoo :) > >> I have what I hope is industry-strenght encryption in my development >> tree with only a few

Re: The poor man's cryptfs

2002-09-25 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 14:18, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >Have you seen ports/security/vncrypt? > > Or src/sys/geom/geom_aes ? Whoo :) > I have what I hope is industry-strenght encryption in my development > tree with only a few more issues to straigten out before it hits -current. MFC? 8-) So

Re: The poor man's cryptfs

2002-09-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel O'Connor" writes: >On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 08:52, James Gritton wrote: >> After playing with a few encrypted filesystems, and giving up on them (after >> a kernel crash or two), I went looking for something else to encrypt. The >> logical choice is the devic

Re: The poor man's cryptfs

2002-09-25 Thread James Gritton
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you seen ports/security/vncrypt? Oops :-). I never was very good at looking to see what's out there. It looks good - it apparently supports different crypto algorithms and isn't broken WRT labels. Oh well, I can still call mine the poor

Re: The poor man's cryptfs

2002-09-25 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 08:52, James Gritton wrote: > After playing with a few encrypted filesystems, and giving up on them (after > a kernel crash or two), I went looking for something else to encrypt. The > logical choice is the device. Have you seen ports/security/vncrypt? I use ports/security