TECTED]>; "Stefan Esser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
> On 2002-01-01 19:59 +, John Rochester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stefan Esser wrote:
> >
> > >Ins
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Esser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Rochester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stefan Esser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Re: userland program
On 2002-01-01 19:59 +, John Rochester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Esser wrote:
>
> >Instead of the for loop, I'd rather have:
> >
> > while(waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) == EINTR)
> >
> This should be
>
> while (waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) < 0 && errno == EINTR)
Yes, obviously ... ;-)
On 2001-12-31 11:31 -0500, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (The second method, used only if there is no PROCFS, is to call
> > kill(PID, 0), which will check if a signal could be delivered.
> > That method should probably be prefered to the reading of procfs
> > anyway, since the
>
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=32681
>
> The cause is a NULL pointer dereference in that fstatfs system
> call, where some pointer hanging off a vnode is cleared. Nessusd
> tries to read from /proc/PID (for PID = process IDs of plugins
> spawned) in order to see whether so
On 2001-12-31 10:29 -0500, Michael Scheidell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as for hanging processes, this is probaly due to the bug in the FBSD
> distributer libpcap, hanging on pcap_next().
IIRC, most processes were sleeping in select(). But truss revealed,
that some processes were running in a l
6 matches
Mail list logo
