Re: Question about Posix Threads

2001-04-26 Thread '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
* PETIT Sebastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 01:43] wrote: > Hi, > > Is it the same limitation problem about the performance under mysql with a > lot of IO ? Yes, basically most of the performance problems you're seeing on FreeBSD should be because of the threads libraries, nothing else. You m

RE: Question about Posix Threads

2001-04-26 Thread PETIT Sebastien
Hi, Is it the same limitation problem about the performance under mysql with a lot of IO ? I test FreeBSD-4.3 pthread and linux 2.2.16 pthread under same servers (ram, dd etc...) with mysql and same databases exactly. When I doing a request of about 57000 rows on a 400 rows database under lin

RE: Question about Posix Threads

2001-04-24 Thread Alan Tegel
nks again guys for any and all info. +-ADT -Original Message- From: Alfred Perlstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:48 AM To: Alan Tegel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question about Posix Threads * Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 09

Re: Question about Posix Threads

2001-04-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 09:33] wrote: > How we got to this question: > > We have been using 5 Compaq 8500's running NT 4.0 using Loadrunner > (Mercury Interactive) to test the load. The Linux box was barely > able to hold the load, but it's support to

RE: Question about Posix Threads

2001-04-24 Thread Alan Tegel
ed Perlstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:24 AM To: Alan Tegel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question about Posix Threads * Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 07:29] wrote: > How well does FreeBSD 4.3 do with Posix Threads? > > This is a question

Re: Question about Posix Threads

2001-04-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 07:29] wrote: > How well does FreeBSD 4.3 do with Posix Threads? > > This is a question I posted to a news group. > > Hello. I work for a unix performance and capacity group. owever, we have > had some dismal performance from RedHat 6.2. The question t