* PETIT Sebastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 01:43] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it the same limitation problem about the performance under mysql with a
> lot of IO ?
Yes, basically most of the performance problems you're seeing on FreeBSD
should be because of the threads libraries, nothing else.
You m
Hi,
Is it the same limitation problem about the performance under mysql with a
lot of IO ?
I test FreeBSD-4.3 pthread and linux 2.2.16 pthread under same servers (ram,
dd etc...) with mysql and same databases exactly. When I doing a request of
about 57000 rows on a 400 rows database under lin
nks again guys for any and all info.
+-ADT
-Original Message-
From: Alfred Perlstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Alan Tegel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about Posix Threads
* Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 09
* Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 09:33] wrote:
> How we got to this question:
>
> We have been using 5 Compaq 8500's running NT 4.0 using Loadrunner
> (Mercury Interactive) to test the load. The Linux box was barely
> able to hold the load, but it's support to
ed Perlstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Alan Tegel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about Posix Threads
* Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 07:29] wrote:
> How well does FreeBSD 4.3 do with Posix Threads?
>
> This is a question
* Alan Tegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010424 07:29] wrote:
> How well does FreeBSD 4.3 do with Posix Threads?
>
> This is a question I posted to a news group.
>
> Hello. I work for a unix performance and capacity group. owever, we have
> had some dismal performance from RedHat 6.2. The question t
6 matches
Mail list logo