Re: problem cross-compiling 9.1

2012-10-09 Thread Warner Losh
On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > [snip] >> any fix? >>> You have found the fix. Remove the WITHOUT_ options from the build >>> that keep it from completing. You'll be able to add them at installworld >>> time w/o a hassle. nanobsd uses this to keep things down, while s

Re: problem cross-compiling 9.1

2012-10-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Oct 9, 2012, at 3:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > [snip] >> any fix? >>> You have found the fix. Remove the WITHOUT_ options from the build >>> that keep it from completing. You'll be able to add them at installworld >>> time w/o a hassle. nanobsd uses this to keep things down, while s

Re: problem cross-compiling 9.1

2012-10-09 Thread Daniel Braniss
[snip] > any fix? > > You have found the fix. Remove the WITHOUT_ options from the build > > that keep it from completing. You'll be able to add them at installworld > > time w/o a hassle. nanobsd uses this to keep things down, while still > > being able to build the system. > > Warner >

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-09-14 Thread John Schumacher
These replies seemed to dance around the actual issue, I assume this wasn't resolved? I have been seeing this lately in gdb7.2 built from ports, and was curious as to what the real issue was. excerpt: [Thread 803855580 (LWP 100241 IPC UDP Socket) ex ited] error: Invalid selected t

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-27 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:03:19 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Andriy Gapon writes: > > > on 26/05/2011 16:33 John Baldwin said the following: > >> On Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:37:13 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> on 26/05/2011 03:35 Raphael Kubo da Costa said the following: > If I compile

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-26 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Andriy Gapon writes: > on 26/05/2011 16:33 John Baldwin said the following: >> On Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:37:13 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 26/05/2011 03:35 Raphael Kubo da Costa said the following: If I compile the port myself, I can't run any binary (PR ports/152896, which has been

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-26 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 26/05/2011 16:33 John Baldwin said the following: > On Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:37:13 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 26/05/2011 03:35 Raphael Kubo da Costa said the following: >>> If I compile the port myself, I can't run any binary (PR ports/152896, >>> which has been unanswered despite my effort

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:37:13 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 26/05/2011 03:35 Raphael Kubo da Costa said the following: > > If I compile the port myself, I can't run any binary (PR ports/152896, > > which has been unanswered despite my efforts): > > > > Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/gdb72

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 8:35:28 pm Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Dmitry Krivenok writes: > > > As you can see program exited normally w/o any errors. > > Then I run the same program under gdb-7.2 > > > > $ /usr/local/bin/gdb72 --args t > > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2 [GDB v7.2 for FreeBSD] > > Copyrigh

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-26 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 26/05/2011 03:35 Raphael Kubo da Costa said the following: > If I compile the port myself, I can't run any binary (PR ports/152896, > which has been unanswered despite my efforts): > > Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/gdb72...I'm sorry, Dave, I can't > do that. Symbol format `elf64-x86-

Re: Problem with running simple pthreads program under gdb-7.2 (Invalid selected thread)

2011-05-25 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Dmitry Krivenok writes: > As you can see program exited normally w/o any errors. > Then I run the same program under gdb-7.2 > > $ /usr/local/bin/gdb72 --args t > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2 [GDB v7.2 for FreeBSD] > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or la

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-04-27 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 3:41:07 am Vladimir Laskov wrote: > On 04/26/2011 07:43 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > --- //depot/projects/mcelog/mcelog.c2010-08-25 11:41:19.0 > > > > +++ /home/jhb/work/p4/mcelog/mcelog.c 2010-08-25 11:41:19.0 > > > > @@ -29,6 +

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-04-27 Thread Vladimir Laskov
On 04/26/2011 07:43 PM, John Baldwin wrote: --- //depot/projects/mcelog/mcelog.c2010-08-25 11:41:19.0 +++ /home/jhb/work/p4/mcelog/mcelog.c 2010-08-25 11:41:19.0 @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ #include #include #include +#ifdef __i386__ +/* Conflicts with 'enum cputype'

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-04-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10:10:44 am Vladimir Laskov wrote: > have problem for i386 > == > > # gmake FREEBSD=yes i386=yes > Makefile:92: .depend: No such file or directory > cc -MM -I. p4.c k8.c mcelog.c dmi.c tsc.c core2.c bitfield.c intel.c > nehale

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-04-26 Thread Vladimir Laskov
On 02/18/2011 03:11 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 18 February 2011 14:13, venom wrote: On 02/11/2011 11:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, February 11, 2011 7:48:39 am venom wrote: Hello. i am trying build mcelog FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jan 14 04:15:5

Re: Problem with etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting

2011-02-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/22/2011 07:57, Garrett Cooper wrote: Can accounting_file by provided by user input (doesn't look like it today, but just to be safe I thought I should check)? These are the kinds of questions it's good to answer for yourself before you post to the list. :) If so then the dirname

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-02-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, February 18, 2011 7:11:07 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 18 February 2011 14:13, venom wrote: > > On 02/11/2011 11:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> On Friday, February 11, 2011 7:48:39 am venom wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> i am trying build mcelog > >>> > >>> > >>> FreeBSD

Re: Problem with etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting

2011-02-22 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Ignore my last. > > The problem is that if /var/account/acct disappears then accounting stops. > The attached is better, albeit more complicated. It also has the pleasant > side effect of cleaning up /etc/rc.d/accounting a bit. > > I've confir

Re: Problem with etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting

2011-02-22 Thread Doug Barton
Ignore my last. The problem is that if /var/account/acct disappears then accounting stops. The attached is better, albeit more complicated. It also has the pleasant side effect of cleaning up /etc/rc.d/accounting a bit. I've confirmed that with this patch nothing is lost while the file is be

Re: Problem with etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting

2011-02-22 Thread Daniel Gerzo
On 22.2.2011 3:47, Doug Barton wrote: I was looking over etc/periodic/daily/310.accounting on a system that is very tight on space in /var, and I think that at minimum there is a race, and at best there is a pretty serious inefficiency. Right now after rotating the old logs the script does this:

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-02-18 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 18 February 2011 14:13, venom wrote: > On 02/11/2011 11:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On Friday, February 11, 2011 7:48:39 am venom wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> i am trying build mcelog >>> >>> >>> FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jan 14 >>> 04:15:56 >>> UTC 2011 r

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-02-18 Thread venom
On 02/11/2011 11:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, February 11, 2011 7:48:39 am venom wrote: Hello. i am trying build mcelog FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jan 14 04:15:56 UTC 2011 root@freebsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # fetch http://ftp2.pl.freebsd

Re: problem with build mcelog

2011-02-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, February 11, 2011 7:48:39 am venom wrote: > Hello. > > i am trying build mcelog > > > FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jan 14 04:15:56 > UTC 2011 root@freebsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > # fetch > http://ftp2.pl.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfile

Re: problem debugging kernel module using kernel crash dump with kgdb

2011-01-17 Thread Miki Magyari
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Miki Magyari wrote: > hi, > > I'm new to kernel programming, working on a kernel module and trying > to debug a crash dump after a panic. Here is the backtrace: > > (kgdb) bt > #0  doadump () at pcpu.h:246 > #1  0xc089cb9e in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/k

Re: problem debugging kernel module using kernel crash dump with kgdb

2011-01-16 Thread Miki Magyari
> > Any pointers why this subfunction not shown with "bt" and why I cannot > get local variables for it? > hi, after sending this question and having a short break I've just realized that it is caused by the compiler optimization. -O0 seems to help. br, Miki _

Re: problem debugging kernel module using kernel crash dump with kgdb

2011-01-16 Thread Ryan Stone
gcc has helpfully inlined minixfs_mountfs into minixfs_mount for you. kgdb, which is basically gdb patched to understand the structure of kernel cores, has no idea how to handle inlined functions. Sadly, you have only two options here that I'm aware of: 1) If the crash is reproducible, recompile

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-15 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 15/08/2010, at 23:25, Paul Thornton wrote: > With Linux, it all works as expected - but the linux tcsetattr doesn't > like the nonstandard baud rate either. However, in linux I used > setserial to set a base baud rate of 2400 and a divisor of 96 to get > 250k baud rate. When I run, I have

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-15 Thread Paul Thornton
Paul Thornton wrote: > Ed Schouten wrote: >> * Paul Thornton wrote: >>> I'm using 8.0-RELEASE with uftdi and ucom driving the serial port. >> Somewhat unrelated question: have you ever tried running the this code >> on 7.x? If so, did it work? > > I've just tried this on 7.2-RELEASE (that was the

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-14 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 15/08/2010, at 9:38, Paul Thornton wrote: > Part of the problem I'm having is that whenever you try and search for > information/docs about this sort of thing, you're transported back in a > time warp to the 1980s where people used serial terminals as the norm > for access and everything seems

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-14 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Paul Thornton wrote: > Ed Schouten wrote: >> * Paul Thornton wrote: >>> I'm using 8.0-RELEASE with uftdi and ucom driving the serial port. >> >> Somewhat unrelated question: have you ever tried running the this code >> on 7.x? If so, did it work? > > I've just tri

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-14 Thread Paul Thornton
Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On 15/08/2010, at 3:00, Paul Thornton wrote: >> So according to the documentation, the effect of the break should be to >> flush the input and output buffers, and send a SIGINT to my process. The >> buffer doesn't seem to get flushed, and I don't get sent the SIGINT. > > I

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-14 Thread Paul Thornton
Ed Schouten wrote: > * Paul Thornton wrote: >> I'm using 8.0-RELEASE with uftdi and ucom driving the serial port. > > Somewhat unrelated question: have you ever tried running the this code > on 7.x? If so, did it work? I've just tried this on 7.2-RELEASE (that was the only 7.x CD I could find lu

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-14 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 15/08/2010, at 3:00, Paul Thornton wrote: > So according to the documentation, the effect of the break should be to > flush the input and output buffers, and send a SIGINT to my process. The > buffer doesn't seem to get flushed, and I don't get sent the SIGINT. It does sounds like it's ignorin

Re: Problem detecting and reacting to serial break

2010-08-14 Thread Ed Schouten
* Paul Thornton wrote: > I'm using 8.0-RELEASE with uftdi and ucom driving the serial port. Somewhat unrelated question: have you ever tried running the this code on 7.x? If so, did it work? -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgp1PRCv6Lq6n.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Problem in bin/sh stripping the * character through ${expansion%}

2009-09-11 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:26:50AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:15:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > I came across this problem during a recent portmaster update. When > > trying to strip off the * character using variable expansion in bin/sh > > it doesn't work. Other

Re: Problem in bin/sh stripping the * character through ${expansion%}

2009-08-08 Thread Doug Barton
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Doug, good day. > > Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:15:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> I came across this problem during a recent portmaster update. When >> trying to strip off the * character using variable expansion in bin/sh >> it doesn't work. Other "special" characters do

Re: Problem in bin/sh stripping the * character through ${expansion%}

2009-08-06 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Doug, good day. Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:15:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I came across this problem during a recent portmaster update. When > trying to strip off the * character using variable expansion in bin/sh > it doesn't work. Other "special" characters do work if they are > properly escap

Re: Problem in bin/sh stripping the * character through ${expansion%}

2009-08-06 Thread Johan van Selst
Johan van Selst wrote: > When I tried it myself, I automatically typed quotes, which does work > var="${var%\*}" Really should learn to read better: this in fact procudes 'foo' rather than 'foo\' in the given example case. Again, not like bash. Johan pgpbI94sMye6i.pgp Description: PGP si

Re: Problem in bin/sh stripping the * character through ${expansion%}

2009-08-06 Thread Johan van Selst
Doug Barton wrote: > I came across this problem during a recent portmaster update. When > trying to strip off the * character using variable expansion in bin/sh > it doesn't work. Other "special" characters do work if they are > properly escaped. Your script does var=${var%\*} When I trie

Re: Problem with vm.pmap.shpgperproc and vm.pmap.pv_entry_max

2009-07-05 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:18 AM, c0re dumped wrote: > So, I never had problem with this server, but recently it starts to > giv me the following messages *every* minute : > > Jul 3 10:04:00 squid kernel: Approaching the limit on PV entries, > consider increasing either the vm.pmap.shpgperproc or

Re: Problem: FreeBSD 7.x && ssh v2 && nss_ldap

2009-04-16 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Wed, 15.04.2009 at 12:14:48 -0700, Benjamin Lee wrote: > On 04/15/2009 01:33 AM, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > > > I see a problem on two systems running FreeBSD 7.0 or 7.1 which are > > configured as OpenLDAP clients using the nss_ldap module. > > > > When someone logs on using ssh protocol version

Re: Problem: FreeBSD 7.x && ssh v2 && nss_ldap

2009-04-15 Thread Benjamin Lee
On 04/15/2009 01:33 AM, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > I see a problem on two systems running FreeBSD 7.0 or 7.1 which are > configured as OpenLDAP clients using the nss_ldap module. > > When someone logs on using ssh protocol version 2 the session will not > be initialized correctly. The user will only

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-04-02 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
Ed Maste wrote: 2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : Hello, All Describe my problem: have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after r

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-31 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
Vladimir Ermakov wrote: Hello, All Describe my problem: have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after read 6GB data from this f

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-28 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : >Hello, All > >Describe my problem: >have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 >2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) >i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume >system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after read 6GB data >f

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-25 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
Ed Maste wrote: 2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : Hello, All Describe my problem: have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after r

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-24 Thread Ed Maste
2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : >Hello, All > >Describe my problem: >have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 >2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) >i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume >system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after read 6GB data >

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-24 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
pluknet wrote: 2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : Hello, All Describe my problem: have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 You can check status of aac controller with arcconf utility and post results there.. OK i am try enter command: # arcconf task start 1 device 0 4 ve

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-24 Thread pluknet
2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : > Hello, All > > Describe my problem: > have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 > 2 HHD of 6  have errors in smart data (damaged) > i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume > system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after read 6GB d

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-24 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
Attilio Rao wrote: 2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : Hello, All Describe my problem: have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) afte

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-24 Thread Vladimir Ermakov
Vladimir Ermakov wrote: Hello, All Describe my problem: have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 2 HHD of 6 have errors in smart data (damaged) i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after read 6GB data from this f

Re: [problem] aac0 does not respond

2009-03-24 Thread Attilio Rao
2009/3/24 Vladimir Ermakov : > Hello, All > > Describe my problem: > have volume RAID-10 (SAS-HDD x 6) on Adaptec RAID 5805 > 2 HHD of 6  have errors in smart data (damaged) > i am try read file /var/db/mysql/ibdata1 from this volume > system does not respond ( lost access to ssh ) after read 6GB d

Re: problem with bus_dmamap_load_uio

2008-11-04 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:49:57 -0500, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Hello, > > I don't understand why bus_dmamap_load_uio() cannot load the uio. > > Also when it fails, i copy the uio into a buffer and then a > > bus_dmamap_load() of the buffer always works. > > > > The dma tag is allo

Re: problem with bus_dmamap_load_uio

2008-11-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 03 November 2008 03:50:21 pm Patrick Lamaizière wrote: > Hello, > > (8-Current/i386) > > I've got a problem with bus_dmamap_load_uio(9). I want to use it to > map an uio for DMA with the Geode security block (glxsb(4)). > > It works, i can make milions of crypto operations with cryptot

Re: Problem Protecting Directories Securly

2008-09-28 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Mike, good day. Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 06:45:11PM -0700, Mike Price wrote: > My buddy helped me install Apache Webserver but there is somthing wrong when > I try to password protect my directories? I already created '.htaccess' & > 'htpasswd' and but I still cannot password protect the directory...

Re: Problem with an rc script

2008-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) wrote: Hi, I'm trying to deal with a rc script I'm writing to launch a deamon. I wrote it based on the hanbook rc script sample. It works pretty well but I have some (strange to me) warning message. Your script looks pretty good, but it needs a little work. :) I assume t

Re: Problem with find -prune...

2008-04-03 Thread Mike Meyer
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Meyer <> wrote: > > find -prune seems to not quite do what it says. At least, when delete > > is used. Here's an example tree (on 7.0-RELEASE, amd64 build): > It behaves exactly as documented. I'll try to

Re: Problem with find -prune...

2008-04-03 Thread Oliver Fromme
Mike Meyer <> wrote: > find -prune seems to not quite do what it says. At least, when delete > is used. Here's an example tree (on 7.0-RELEASE, amd64 build): It behaves exactly as documented. I'll try to explain. > bhuda% find /tmp/x -prune > /tmp/x > > Hmm, it prints the root of the tree

Re: problem with loading all fixed now

2008-02-29 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Robey wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: >> Ben Kaduk wrote: > >>> cat nvidia_load="YES"" >> /boot/loader.conf >> I'd never heard that about it needing absolutely to load at boot time, but >> you were absolutely right, I have it working now. > >> It a

Re: problem with loading 1/2 fixed

2008-02-29 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Robey wrote: > Ben Kaduk wrote: > >> cat nvidia_load="YES"" >> /boot/loader.conf > > I'd never heard that about it needing absolutely to load at boot time, but > you were absolutely right, I have it working now. > > It also made my loading pro

Re: problem with ldconfig; nvidia loading fixed

2008-02-29 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Kaduk wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > On 2/28/08, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> > [snip RAID/loader interaction] >> Well, the other thing that's come up, I can't get my nvidia driver to work

Re: problem with ldconfig

2008-02-29 Thread Ben Kaduk
Hi Chuck, On 2/28/08, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > [snip RAID/loader interaction] > Well, the other thing that's come up, I can't get my nvidia driver to work > along with xorg. It used to show it's arrival both in kldstat, AND also

Re: problem compiling RELENG_6

2007-11-18 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 04:48:40PM -0800, Darren Reed wrote: > My apologies > > I forgot to do a "cvs commit" of sbin/ipf in addition to contrib/ipfilter > and sys/contrib/ipfilter. I've just done a commit that should fix this. >... It did: g1-18(6.3-P)[1] uname -a FreeBSD g1-18.catwhisker.org.

Re: problem compiling RELENG_6

2007-11-18 Thread Darren Reed
My apologies I forgot to do a "cvs commit" of sbin/ipf in addition to contrib/ipfilter and sys/contrib/ipfilter. I've just done a commit that should fix this. Cheers, Darren Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:03:28PM -0300, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > I've downloaded the REL

Re: problem compiling RELENG_6

2007-11-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:03:28PM -0300, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > I've downloaded the RELENG_6 through csup. While compiling the > source with make buildworld I get the next error: > > -8<--8<--8<--8<--8<- > ===> sbin/ipf/libipf (depend) > make: don'

Re: Problem with Broadcom 5704 B1 on amd64 6.2 release

2007-07-16 Thread James Shank
Stefan, Another thing that might be helpful: When I last looked at the motherboard, I remember seeing the chip identified as a BCM 5704 B1. The BGE driver seems to think it is a B0. I don't know if this is significant, but I thought the more information I gave, the more you and the other smart

Re: Problem with Broadcom 5704 B1 on amd64 6.2 release

2007-07-16 Thread James Shank
Dear John, Thanks for the suggestion. I tried the 7.0 livefs snapshot and had the same results as with the 6.2 release; identical errors on both. Thanks, James On 7/16/07, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 16 July 2007 01:37:40 am James Shank wrote: > Greetings, > > I've run

Re: Problem with Broadcom 5704 B1 on amd64 6.2 release

2007-07-16 Thread James Shank
Dear Stefan, Thanks for your help. I've attached the information you requested. In particular, here are the relevant sections of the dmesg output: pcib5: at device 11.0 on pci8 pcib5: secondary bus 10 pcib5: subordinate bus 10 pcib5: I/O decode0xf000-0xfff pcib5: memory d

Re: Problem with Broadcom 5704 B1 on amd64 6.2 release

2007-07-16 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 16 July 2007 01:37:40 am James Shank wrote: > Greetings, > > I've run into a problem with the onboard Broadcom 5704 NetXtreme nics > on a Tyan S2891 Thunder K8SRE motherboard. > > Here is the relevant dmesg output to show the error: > > pcib5: at device 11.0 on pci8 > pci10: on pcib5

Re: Problem with test(1)

2007-04-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:08 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Apr 05), Joe Marcus Clarke said: > > I noticed something weird with test(1) when I ran across a problem port > > Makefile. Our test(1) doesn't properly check to make sure there is an > > operand argument to unary operators

Re: Problem with test(1)

2007-04-05 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 05), Joe Marcus Clarke said: > I noticed something weird with test(1) when I ran across a problem port > Makefile. Our test(1) doesn't properly check to make sure there is an > operand argument to unary operators like -f. For example: > > test -f > > Will print "TRUE" o

Re: Problem with test(1)

2007-04-05 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 03:12 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I noticed something weird with test(1) when I ran across a problem port > Makefile. Our test(1) doesn't properly check to make sure there is an > operand argument to unary operators like -f. For example: > > test -f > > Will print "T

Re: problem with apache bench

2006-12-30 Thread Steve Hodgson
Bartosz Giza wrote: > Hi, > > from couple of days i am trying to figure out what is wrong with apache > bench. I want to test my remote site with it but all the time i got this > error message. > > % ab -c 10 -n 500 http://x/test.php > Test aborted after 10 failures > > apr_socket_connect(): Op

Re: problem with apache bench

2006-12-30 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.12.30 21:10:50 +0100, Bartosz Giza wrote: > from couple of days i am trying to figure out what is wrong with apache > bench. I want to test my remote site with it but all the time i got this > error message. > > % ab -c 10 -n 500 http://x/test.php > Test aborted after 10 failures > >

Re: Problem with routes when configuring IPv6 addresses

2006-10-26 Thread Jan Mikael Melen
Hi, Just answering my own mail. Here is small patch that fixes this problem for us in 6.1. --- nd6_rtr.c.orig Mon Mar 20 18:23:08 2006 +++ nd6_rtr.c Thu Oct 26 09:48:59 2006 @@ -1409,12 +1409,20 @@ if (pr->ndpr_raf_onlink == 0) conti

Re: Problem installing Mathematica on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-09-13 Thread Tony Maher
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:42:07AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > > >>I have test installed Mathematica 5.2 and it appears to work fine >>(I do not actually use it except for simple tests) >> >>ldd Mathematica >>Mathematica: >>libm.so.6 => /lib/obsolete/linuxthreads/libm.so

Re: Problem installing Mathematica on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-09-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:42:07AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > I have test installed Mathematica 5.2 and it appears to work fine > (I do not actually use it except for simple tests) > > ldd Mathematica > Mathematica: > libm.so.6 => /lib/obsolete/linuxthreads/libm.so.6 (0x384ed000) > libpth

Re: Problem installing Mathematica on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-09-12 Thread Tony Maher
Alexey Mikhailov wrote: > I installed Mathematica 5.1 on my FreeBSD 6.1 system. And I can't run it.. > That's very strange behaviour: > > ~/Mathematica/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/Binaries/Linux % ./Mathematica > ./Mathematica: relocation error: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6: undefined > symbol: __stderrp

Re: Problem installing Mathematica on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-09-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:09:27PM +0400, Alexey Mikhailov wrote: > Hello! > > Sometime ago I posted this message to freebsd-questions@, but had no > answer. So I'll try my luck > here. > > - > > Hello! > > I installed Mathematica 5.1 on

Re: Problem: fpa(4) on sparc64 6.1-RELEASE

2006-06-21 Thread Rink Springer
Hi, On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:31:56AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:47:54PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote.. > > I am getting a panic with a GENERIC with all non-available hardware > > drivers stripped out with "device fddi" and "device fpa" in the config. > > The only things

Re: Problem: fpa(4) on sparc64 6.1-RELEASE

2006-06-20 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:47:54PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote.. > I am getting a panic with a GENERIC with all non-available hardware > drivers stripped out with "device fddi" and "device fpa" in the config. > The only things I added to GENERIC after stripping out the unneeded > things was the fdd

Re: problem with SCSI

2006-06-07 Thread Oleg D.
Doug Barton wrote: Oleg D. wrote: Sorry for some offtopic. Experiencing some troubles with SCSI disks on FBSD 4.8 This version is way past its useful life. You should seriously plan to upgrade at the earliest possible moment. Maybe, but this machine has some jails on it. And after

Re: problem with SCSI

2006-06-06 Thread Doug Barton
Oleg D. wrote: > > Sorry for some offtopic. > > Experiencing some troubles with SCSI disks on FBSD 4.8 This version is way past its useful life. You should seriously plan to upgrade at the earliest possible moment. > and looking for advice/solution how to fix/diagnose-more... > > What (maybe n

Re: Problem with jails after upgrading to 6.1-STABLE

2006-05-19 Thread Roberto Lima
I mean that pkill -j only works in freebsd 6.x, man 8 jail says: To show and then kill processes in jail number 3 use the following commands: pgrep -lfj 3 pkill -j 3 or: killall -j 3 but i don't know why killall -j doesn't work.. Thanks, Roberto. 2006/5/19, B

Re: Problem with jails after upgrading to 6.1-STABLE

2006-05-19 Thread Roberto Lima
Hi, your problem is simple, if jid shows in jls yet, just try: pkill -j JID ps: -j flag works only RELENG_6 thanks and sorry for my bad english. Roberto. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ha

Re: Problem with jails after upgrading to 6.1-STABLE

2006-05-18 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:09:49PM +0200, Bartosz Giza wrote: > Hi, > > Recently i have upgraded my box to 6.1-STABLE. Before i have had 6.0-STABLE. > > I am running couple of jails on this box and right now something is messed > up with startup scripts or somewhere else. > Worst thing is that i

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-03 Thread Gilbert Fernandes
> The problem is that libnet defines ether_addr without regard for the fact > that it's defined in our system headers. This is a bug in libnet, not > FreeBSD. Very interesting information :) Thanks for your reply (and happy new year !) -- unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; m

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2006-01-01 Thread ari edelkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-December/014986.html > > The problem is that libnet defines ether_addr without regard for the fact > that it's defined in our system headers. This is a bug in libnet, not > FreeBSD. No one claimed otherwise --

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread Matt Emmerton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Did you read my post? > > > Or are you not on the list? I sent my response directly to the list, > > > not including you specifically. > [...] > > I am on the list,and I don't receive your post. > > I think you can send post specifically to me and cc > > to the l

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread ari edelkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Did you read my post? > > Or are you not on the list? I sent my response directly to the list, > > not including you specifically. [...] > I am on the list,and I don't receive your post. > I think you can send post specifically to me and cc > to the list :-). > Thanks

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread prime
On 1/1/06, ari edelkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did you read my post? > Or are you not on the list? I sent my response directly to the list, > not including you specifically. > > ari > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [...] > > In my opinion,struct ether_addr is defined both in > > and libne

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread prime
On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:55:38 +0800 > > From: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-To: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread Gilbert Fernandes
> - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:55:38 +0800 > From: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0 > To: Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread ari edelkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I find that I can't include when I programming > > > with libnet,because $(CC) complains that "struct ether_addr redefined". > > > But I need some definitions in ,struct ether_header etc. > > > Currentl

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread prime
On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I find that I can't include when I programming > > with libnet,because $(CC) complains that "struct ether_addr redefined". > > But I need some definitions in ,struct ether_header etc. > > Currently,I just copy the definitions I need f

Re: Problem booting FreeBSD from cboot FreeBSD from cdrom using grubdrom using grub

2005-12-21 Thread Oliver Fromme
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 December 2005 11:43 pm, Tony wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to make an iso image that will boot FreeBSD using GRUB boot > > loader. > > Grub will boot /boot/loader and the loader will boot /boot/kernel. It > > goes well on my disk, bu

Re: Problem booting FreeBSD from cboot FreeBSD from cdrom using grubdrom using g

2005-12-21 Thread Sergey Babkin
>From: Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm trying to make an iso image that will boot FreeBSD using GRUB boot >loader. > >Then the kernel starts, but when the kernel try to mount the root fs, it >stops. I have the follow line in my /etc/fstab >/dev/acd0c / cd9660 ro

Re: Problem booting FreeBSD from cboot FreeBSD from cdrom using grubdrom using grub

2005-12-21 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 11:43 pm, Tony wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to make an iso image that will boot FreeBSD using GRUB boot > loader. > Grub will boot /boot/loader and the loader will boot /boot/kernel. It > goes well on my disk, but when I try to make a livecd, it fails. I spend > some ti

Re: Problem booting FreeBSD from cboot FreeBSD from cdrom using grubdrom using grub

2005-12-21 Thread Tony
I'm using FreeBSD 5.4 grub 0.95 Is this what you want? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ??,??,??grub??freebsd,???, ??grub?ufs2 ?fc2,grub0.94 ???,? ??? - Original Message - From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: Problem with ath(4) and Netgear WG311T card

2005-08-31 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Aug 31 05, Freddie Cash wrote: > > Lots of great info follows, but you forgot the most important part: > version of FreeBSD this is running on. :) There have been updates the > the Atheros HAL between FreeBSD versions 5.3, 5.4, and 6.0. Each > update supports more Atheros revisions.

  1   2   3   >